73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10599466)
21. Are levels on cervical specimens necessary?
Salman W; Al-Dawoud A; Twaij Z; Howat A
J Clin Pathol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1230. PubMed ID: 18955581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of HPV 16 PCR detection in self- compared with clinician-collected samples in women referred for colposcopy.
Daponte A; Pournaras S; Mademtzis I; Hadjichristodoulou C; Kostopoulou E; Maniatis AN; Messinis IE
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Nov; 103(2):463-6. PubMed ID: 16626791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Trial quickly changed management of cervical abnormalities.
Zielinski SL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Apr; 97(7):479-80. PubMed ID: 15812071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Cervicography.
Runkle G; Ellis D; Bradshaw D; MacDonald D; Johnson B
J Fam Pract; 1994 Jan; 38(1):10, 13. PubMed ID: 8289042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. DCS liquid-based system is more effective than conventional smears to diagnosis of cervical lesions: study in high-risk population with biopsy-based confirmation.
Longatto Filho A; Pereira SM; Di Loreto C; Utagawa ML; Makabe S; Sakamoto Maeda MY; Marques JA; Santoro CL; Castelo A
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 May; 97(2):497-500. PubMed ID: 15863150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Less pap-2 results ('minor abnormalities') in the population screening for cervical cancer since the introduction of new guidelines in 1996].
Bos AB; van Ballegooijen M; van den Akker-van Marle ME; Habbema JD
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Aug; 146(34):1586-90. PubMed ID: 12224483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Polyps in the mucous membrane of the uterine cervix].
Ivanov I; Makaveeva V
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1969; 8(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 5407261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Comparative assessment of the effectiveness of cytological and histological methods in the diagnosis of onco-pathology of the endometrium and mucous membrane of the cervical canal of the uterus].
Adamian RT
Vopr Onkol; 2002; 48(3):377-9. PubMed ID: 12455367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Interest of new biomarkers in cervical precancerous lesion management].
Dachez R
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37 Suppl 1():S152-4. PubMed ID: 18191337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Removal of blood components from cervical smears: implications for cancer diagnosis using FTIR spectroscopy.
Romeo MJ; Wood BR; Quinn MA; McNaughton D
Biopolymers; 2003; 72(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 12400093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Comparison of monolayer specimens and conventional smears].
Jensen ML; Fuursted PB; Svanholm H
Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Feb; 163(9):1270-5. PubMed ID: 11258251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Clinical uses of computer-assisted cytological screening system in obstetrics and gynecology].
Han S; Li Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Nov; 33(11):690-1. PubMed ID: 10806721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Screening for cancer of uterine cervix and approaches adopted in India.
Murthy NS; Mathew A
Indian J Cancer; 1999; 36(2-4):154-62. PubMed ID: 10921220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Possibilities of using computer analysis in the diagnosis of cervical cancer].
Wiśniewski L; Skawiński W; Makowski T; Jezuita J
Ginekol Pol; 1980 Oct; 51(10):951-7. PubMed ID: 7005032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Do all grade I lesions on colposcopy need to be biopsied?
Suneja A; Guleria K; Mahishee ; Mishra K; Agarwal N
Indian J Cancer; 1999; 36(2-4):135-40. PubMed ID: 10921217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Interpretation of vaginal smears in the diagnosis of cervical cancer: sensitivity vs. specificity.
PORTER JE
Am Pract Dig Treat; 1956 Jul; 7(7):1135-8. PubMed ID: 13327205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Reading the cervical smear: the future is today].
Vacher-Lavenu MC
Ann Pathol; 1999; 19(5 Suppl):S93-6. PubMed ID: 10599465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Recommendations for quality control of cervico-vaginal cytology].
GISCi, Gruppo Italiano Screening del Cervicocarcinoma
Epidemiol Prev; 2004; 28(1 Suppl):1-16. PubMed ID: 15202448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [The evaluation of computer cytological test with colposcopy for the diagnosis of cervical lesions].
He Y; Wang Y; Lang J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1998 May; 33(5):265-7. PubMed ID: 10682434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Results of delayed follow up of abnormal cervical smears.
Cotton RE; Elwood JM; Jones GM
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Mar; 292(6523):799-800. PubMed ID: 3082447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
