These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1059961)
21. Use of partograms in labor. Beazley JM Proc R Soc Med; 1972 Aug; 65(8):700. PubMed ID: 5085958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Value of partogram in vaginal birth after caesarean section. Omole-Ohonsi A; Muhammad Z; Iliyasu Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Apr; 27(3):264-6. PubMed ID: 17464807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Visual effect of partogram designs on the management and outcome of labour. Tay SK; Yong TT Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Nov; 36(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 9006820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Role of partogram in high risk pregnancies: an experience at a tertiary centre. Rani J; Sharma D; Sehgal A Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jan; 291(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 25096954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Graphic analysis: an aid in the early recognition of abnormal labors. Ledger WJ Univ Mich Med Cent J; 1967; 33(6):266-9. PubMed ID: 6083226 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Monitoring of labour by partogram. Vaidya PR; Patkar LV J Indian Med Assoc; 1985 May; 83(5):147-9. PubMed ID: 4056433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Graphic records in labour. Studd J; Duiagnan N Br Med J; 1972 Nov; 4(5837):426. PubMed ID: 4637165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Computer diagnosis of labor progression: IV. An on-line interactive digital computer subroutine for evaluating descent of the fetal presenting part during labor. Sokol RJ; Nussbaum RS; Chik L; Rosen MG J Reprod Med; 1974 Nov; 13(5):177-82. PubMed ID: 4610133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Computer diagnosis of labor progression: V. Reliability of a subroutine for evaluating station and descent of the fetal presenting part. Sokol RJ; Nussbaum RS; Chik L; Rosen MG J Reprod Med; 1974 Nov; 13(5):183-6. PubMed ID: 4610134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A cervimeter for continuous measurement of cervical dilatation in labour--Preliminary results. Friedman EA Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1978 Aug; 85(8):638. PubMed ID: 687546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Need for measurement in routine labour. Donaldson IA Proc R Soc Med; 1972 Oct; 65(10):891. PubMed ID: 5085094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Quality of partogram monitoring at a primary health centre in Zambia. Fujita W; Mukumbuta L; Chavuma R; Ohashi K Midwifery; 2015 Jan; 31(1):191-6. PubMed ID: 25248832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Computer analysis of labor progression. IV. Diagnosis of secondary arrest of dilatation. Friedman EA; Kroll BH J Reprod Med; 1971 Oct; 7(4):176-8. PubMed ID: 5135913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Progress of first stage of labour for multiparous women: an observational study. Lavender T; Hart A; Walkinshaw S; Campbell E; Alfirevic Z BJOG; 2005 Dec; 112(12):1663-5. PubMed ID: 16305573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Double-lined nomogram of cervical dilatation in Chinese primigravidas. Chen HF; Chu KK Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1986; 65(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 3799153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predictive value of cervical dilatation rates. I. Primipara labor. Melmed H; Evans M Obstet Gynecol; 1976 May; 47(5):511-5. PubMed ID: 1264396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]