These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10599616)

  • 1. Psychometrically equivalent spondaic words spoken by a female speaker.
    Wilson RH; Strouse A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Dec; 42(6):1336-46. PubMed ID: 10599616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Roberts H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):496-506. PubMed ID: 19253782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spondaic word detection and recognition functions for female and male speakers.
    Cambron NK; Wilson RH; Shanks JE
    Ear Hear; 1991 Feb; 12(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 2026291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Thresholds and psychometric functions of the individual spondaic words.
    Young LL; Dudley B; Gunter MB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Dec; 25(4):586-93. PubMed ID: 7162160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychometric equivalence of recorded spondaic words as test items.
    Bilger RC; Matthies ML; Meyer TA; Griffiths SK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 41(3):516-26. PubMed ID: 9638918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychometrically equivalent Mandarin bisyllabic speech discrimination materials spoken by male and female talkers.
    Nissen SL; Harris RW; Jennings LJ; Eggett DL; Buck H
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Jul; 44(7):379-90. PubMed ID: 16136788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection and recognition masking-level differences for the individual CID W-1 spondaic words.
    Wilson RH; Hopkins JL; Mance CM; Novak RE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Jun; 25(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 7120964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychometrically equivalent trisyllabic words for speech reception threshold testing in Mandarin.
    Nissen SL; Harris RW; Jennings LJ; Eggett DL; Buck H
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Jul; 44(7):391-9. PubMed ID: 16136789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of the Carrier Phrase on Word Recognition Performances by Younger and Older Listeners Using Two Stimulus Paradigms.
    Wilson RH; Sanchez VA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):412-441. PubMed ID: 31968207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychometrically equivalent Russian speech audiometry materials by male and female talkers.
    Harris RW; Nissen SL; Pola MG; McPherson DL; Tavartkiladze GA; Eggett DL
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jan; 46(1):47-66. PubMed ID: 17365055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Masking-level difference for spondaic words in 2000-msec bursts of broadband noise.
    Wilson RH; Zizz CA; Sperry JL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Jul; 5(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 7949295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychometric functions for the CID W-22 and NU Auditory Test No. 6. Materials spoken by the same speaker.
    Wilson RH; Oyler AL
    Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):430-3. PubMed ID: 9360866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Word recognition materials for native speakers of Taiwan Mandarin.
    Nissen SL; Harris RW; Dukes A
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 17(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 18519581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial audiometry: detection of spondaic words in noise.
    Abouchacra K; Letowski T; Koehnke J; Besing J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1998 Dec; 9(6):399-409. PubMed ID: 9865772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustical changes of loudly spoken speech and their effects on speech recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Tschopp K; Käser H; Kunert F
    Br J Audiol; 1992 Jun; 26(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 1393153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Amplitude (vu and rms) and Temporal (msec) Measures of Two Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 Recordings.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):346-54. PubMed ID: 25879239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lexical Influences on Spoken Spondaic Word Recognition in Hearing-Impaired Patients.
    Moulin A; Richard C
    Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():476. PubMed ID: 26778945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relation between slopes of word recognition psychometric functions and homogeneity of the stimulus materials.
    Wilson RH; Carter AS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jan; 12(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 11214979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.