BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10600666)

  • 1. Peak expiratory flow at increased barometric pressure: comparison of peak flow meters and volumetric spirometer.
    Thomas PS; Ng C; Bennett M
    Clin Sci (Lond); 2000 Jan; 98(1):121-4. PubMed ID: 10600666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between peak expiratory flow and FEV(1) measurements on a home spirometer and on a pneumotachograph in children with asthma.
    Brouwer AF; Roorda RJ; Brand PL
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 2007 Sep; 42(9):813-8. PubMed ID: 17639585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Portable peak flow meters: physical characteristics, influence of temperature, altitude, and humidity.
    Pedersen OF; Miller MR; Sigsgaard T; Tidley M; Harding RM
    Eur Respir J; 1994 May; 7(5):991-7. PubMed ID: 8050558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peak expiratory flow at altitude.
    Thomas PS; Harding RM; Milledge JS
    Thorax; 1990 Aug; 45(8):620-2. PubMed ID: 2402726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Serial lung function variability using four portable logging meters.
    Moore VC; Parsons NR; Jaakkola MS; Burge CB; Pantin CF; Robertson AS; Burge PS
    J Asthma; 2009 Nov; 46(9):961-6. PubMed ID: 19905927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of values for peak expiratory flow (PEF) measured with various devices in children].
    Mazur B
    Wiad Lek; 1994 May; 47(9-10):321-4. PubMed ID: 7817586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of peak expiratory flow rates obtained with the Morgan Spirocheck and a Mini Peak Flow Meter.
    Singh HD; Subrahmanyam S; Varagunan M
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 1997 Jan; 41(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 10225042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the assess peak flow meter on human volunteers.
    Venkatesan EA; Walter S; Ray D
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 1994 Oct; 38(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 7883294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reversal of bronchial obstruction with bi-level positive airway pressure and nebulization in patients with acute asthma.
    Brandao DC; Lima VM; Filho VG; Silva TS; Campos TF; Dean E; de Andrade AD
    J Asthma; 2009 May; 46(4):356-61. PubMed ID: 19484669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monitoring of expiratory flow rates and lung volumes during a high altitude expedition.
    Fischer R; Lang SM; Bergner A; Huber RM
    Eur J Med Res; 2005 Nov; 10(11):469-74. PubMed ID: 16354600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of a new desktop spirometer (Spirospec) with a laboratory spirometer in a respiratory out-patient clinic.
    Swart F; Schuurmans MM; Heydenreich JC; Pieper CH; Bolliger CT
    Respir Care; 2003 Jun; 48(6):591-5. PubMed ID: 12780945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of equipment and technique on peak flow measurements.
    Bongers T; O'Driscoll BR
    BMC Pulm Med; 2006 Jun; 6():14. PubMed ID: 16787543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of altitude on spirometric parameters and the performance of peak flow meters.
    Pollard AJ; Mason NP; Barry PW; Pollard RC; Collier DJ; Fraser RS; Miller MR; Milledge JS
    Thorax; 1996 Feb; 51(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 8711651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Standard range of peak expiratory flow in normal, healthy Japanese subjects].
    Tsukioka K; Makino S; Miyamoto T; Takahashi T; Tomioka H; Ito K; Adachi M; Kabe J; Nakajima S; Takishima T; Ohashi Y; Hamada C; Miyazawa M; Wakana A
    Arerugi; 1996 May; 45(5):442-50. PubMed ID: 8752719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency response of variable orifice type peak flow meters: requirements and testing.
    Pedersen OF; Rasmussen TR; Kjaergaard SK; Miller MR; Quanjer PH
    Eur Respir J; 1995 May; 8(5):849-55. PubMed ID: 7656961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of the reliability of 2 portable electronic spirometers].
    Tschopp JM; Roulin JP; Juilland A; Erné R
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1988 Sep; 118(38):1382-5. PubMed ID: 3187474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gas compression artefacts when testing peak expiratory flow meters with mechanically-driven syringes.
    Navajas D; Roca J; Farré R; Rotger M
    Eur Respir J; 1997 Apr; 10(4):901-4. PubMed ID: 9150332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Peak Flow Working Group: test of portable peak flow meters by explosive decompression.
    Pedersen OF; Miller MR
    Eur Respir J Suppl; 1997 Feb; 24():23S-25S. PubMed ID: 9098705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting the accuracy of peak flow meters: a double-blind study using formal methods of agreement.
    Nazir Z; Razaq S; Mir S; Anwar M; Al Mawlawi G; Sajad M; Shehab A; Taylor RS
    Respir Med; 2005 May; 99(5):592-5. PubMed ID: 15823456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beyond the peak flow meter: newer technologies for determining and documenting changes in lung function in the workplace.
    Hankinson JL
    Occup Med; 2000; 15(2):411-20. PubMed ID: 10769346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.