These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Computations of time-dependent photon migration for biomedical optical imaging. Sevick-Muraca EM Methods Enzymol; 1994; 240():748-81. PubMed ID: 7823856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Vaidya JS Lancet; 2001 Dec 22-29; 358(9299):2166; author reply 2167-8. PubMed ID: 11784656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast Tumor Prognostic Characteristics and Biennial vs Annual Mammography, Age, and Menopausal Status. Miglioretti DL; Zhu W; Kerlikowske K; Sprague BL; Onega T; Buist DS; Henderson LM; Smith RA; JAMA Oncol; 2015 Nov; 1(8):1069-77. PubMed ID: 26501844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital and film mammography. Crystal P; Strano S N Engl J Med; 2006 Feb; 354(7):765-7; author reply 765-7. PubMed ID: 16481649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional optical tomographic imaging of breast in a human subject. Jiang H; Xu Y; Iftimia N; Eggert J; Klove K; Baron L; Fajardo L IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1334-40. PubMed ID: 11811833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Full-field digital mammography compared with screen-film mammography in the detection of breast cancer: rays of light through DMIST or more fog? Tice JA; Feldman MD Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Jan; 107(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 17377840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scanning time-domain optical mammography: detection and characterization of breast tumors in vivo. Rinneberg H; Grosenick D; Moesta KT; Mucke J; Gebauer B; Stroszczynski C; Wabnitz H; Moeller M; Wassermann B; Schlag PM Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Oct; 4(5):483-96. PubMed ID: 16173820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: examination protocol. Barra FR; Ribeiro AC; Mathieu OD; Rodrigues AC Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Mar; 95(3):351-2. PubMed ID: 24581728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Menstrual cycle variation in mammographic breast density: so who cares? Baines CJ J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Jun; 90(12):875-6. PubMed ID: 9637132 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Near-infrared laser computed tomography of the breast first clinical experience. Poellinger A; Martin JC; Ponder SL; Freund T; Hamm B; Bick U; Diekmann F Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1545-53. PubMed ID: 19000871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 99m-Tc-MDP-Scintimammography in the evaluation of breast masses or tumor angiogenesis. Turhal NS; Dane F; Dede F; Gumus M; Yumuk PF; Cakalagaoglu F; Savci D; Karaman M; Gulluoglu B; Turoglu HT Anticancer Res; 2004; 24(3b):1999-2006. PubMed ID: 15274391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is there a positive association between mammographic density and bone mineral density? Dite GS; Wark JD; Giles GG; English DR; McCredie MR; Hopper JL Breast Cancer Res; 2006; 8(1):401. PubMed ID: 16524454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Multispectral breast imaging using a ten-wavelength, 64 x 64 source/detector channels silicon photodiode-based diffuse optical tomography system. Li C; Zhao H; Anderson B; Jiang H Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):627-36. PubMed ID: 16878566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro optical characterization and discrimination of female breast tissue during near infrared femtosecond laser pulses propagation. Zacharakis G; Zolindaki A; Sakkalis V; Filippidis G; Papazoglou TG; Tsiftsis DD; Koumantakis E J Biomed Opt; 2001 Oct; 6(4):446-9. PubMed ID: 11728204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]