277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10601513)
1. Caring for the dying--congressional mischief.
Angell M
N Engl J Med; 1999 Dec; 341(25):1923-5. PubMed ID: 10601513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Supreme Court speaks--not assisted suicide but a constitutional right to palliative care.
Burt RA
N Engl J Med; 1997 Oct; 337(17):1234-6. PubMed ID: 9337388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Caring for the dying--congressional mischief.
Castro O; Gordeuk VR; Dawkins F
N Engl J Med; 2000 Apr; 342(14):1049; author reply 1050. PubMed ID: 10755892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Caring for the dying--congressional mischief.
Chevlen E
N Engl J Med; 2000 Apr; 342(14):1049-50. PubMed ID: 10755893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Supreme Court and physician-assisted suicide--rejecting assisted suicide but embracing euthanasia.
Orentlicher D
N Engl J Med; 1997 Oct; 337(17):1236-9. PubMed ID: 9340517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The big chill--inserting the DEA into end-of-life care.
Quill TE; Meier DE
N Engl J Med; 2006 Jan; 354(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 16394295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Thwarting assisted suicide threatens palliative care.
Meisel A
Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2003; 10(1):4, 8. PubMed ID: 16175723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Supreme Court and the purposes of medicine.
Bloche MG
N Engl J Med; 2006 Mar; 354(10):993-5. PubMed ID: 16525134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pain relief. Legal aspects of pain relief for the dying.
Haugen PS
Minn Med; 1997 Nov; 80(11):15-8. PubMed ID: 9385808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Pain Relief Promotion Act: Congress's misguided intervention into end-of-life care.
Buzzee SE
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 2001; 70(1):217-49. PubMed ID: 16389683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Supreme Court and terminal sedation: rejecting assisted suicide, embracing euthanasia.
Orentlicher D
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1997; 24(4):947-68. PubMed ID: 11657288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Congress, controlled substances, and physician-assisted suicide--elephants in mouseholes.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2006 Mar; 354(10):1079-84. PubMed ID: 16525147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The assisted-suicide decision.
N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A22. PubMed ID: 16429626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Justices reject U.S. bid to block assisted suicide; Court, 6-3, says attorney general was wrong in Oregon case.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 16432926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Justices accept case weighing assisted suicide.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2005 Feb; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 15742514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Justices explore U.S. authority over states in assisted suicide.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2005 Oct; ():A1, A32. PubMed ID: 16231463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Physician-assisted suicide in the courts: moral equivalence, double effect, and clinical practice.
Brody H
Minn Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 82(4):939-63. PubMed ID: 11865917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Gonzales v. Oregon upholds the Oregon Death with Dignity Act.
Sclar D
J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(3):639-45. PubMed ID: 17144190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Supreme Court addresses physician-assisted suicide. Can its rulings improve palliative care?
Alpers A; Lo B
Arch Fam Med; 1999; 8(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 10333814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The bell tolls for a constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 1997 Oct; 337(15):1098-1103. PubMed ID: 9321541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
