These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10601522)

  • 1. Outcome after resection of a solid tumor: volume, specialization, or both?
    Taylor I
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2000 Jan; 9(1):27-32, vi. PubMed ID: 10601522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome (Br J Surg 2007; 94: 145-161).
    Davies RJ
    Br J Surg; 2007 May; 94(5):645; author reply 645. PubMed ID: 17443877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of cancer surgery: challenges and controversies.
    Giacomantonio CA; Temple WJ
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2000 Jan; 9(1):51-60, vii. PubMed ID: 10601524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcome--more than just operative mortality.
    Brennan MF; Radzyner M; Rubin DM
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):470-7. PubMed ID: 19466735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Not just another article on cancer surgery volume and patient outcomes.
    Petrelli NJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Oct; 26(28):4530-1. PubMed ID: 18574156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Management and patient survival in hepatocellular carcinoma: does the physician's level of experience matter?
    Chen TM; Chang TM; Huang PT; Tsai MH; Lin LF; Liu CC; Ho KS; Siauw CP; Chao PL; Tung JN
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 23(7 Pt 2):e179-88. PubMed ID: 18466287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modifiable risk factors in colorectal surgery: central role of surgeon's volume.
    Pata G; Casella C; Nascimbeni R; Cirillo L; Salerni B
    Ann Ital Chir; 2008; 79(6):427-32; discussion 432-3. PubMed ID: 19354037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of volume and specialization for cancer surgery.
    Weitz J; Koch M; Friess H; Büchler MW
    Dig Surg; 2004; 21(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 15308864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the quality of surgical care.
    Fink AS; Itani KM; Campbell DC
    Surg Clin North Am; 2007 Aug; 87(4):837-52, vi. PubMed ID: 17888783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery.
    Bilimoria KY; Bentrem DJ; Feinglass JM; Stewart AK; Winchester DP; Talamonti MS; Ko CY
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Oct; 26(28):4626-33. PubMed ID: 18574159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. It just didn't work: the realities of quality assessment in the English health care context.
    Hughes R; Aspinal F; Addington-Hall JM; Dunckley M; Faull C; Higginson I
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Sep; 41(7):705-12. PubMed ID: 15288793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Charlson comorbidity index as a predictor of long-term outcome after surgery for nonsmall cell lung cancer.
    Birim O; Kappetein AP; Bogers AJ
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Nov; 28(5):759-62. PubMed ID: 16157485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Associations between hospital and surgeon procedure volumes and patient outcomes after ovarian cancer resection.
    Schrag D; Earle C; Xu F; Panageas KS; Yabroff KR; Bristow RE; Trimble EL; Warren JL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Feb; 98(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 16449676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proper treatment selection may improve survival in patients with clinical early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer.
    Birim O; Kappetein AP; Goorden T; van Klaveren RJ; Bogers AJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Sep; 80(3):1021-6. PubMed ID: 16122477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence of the effect of 'specialization' on the management, surgical outcome and survival from colorectal cancer in Wessex.
    Smith JA; King PM; Lane RH; Thompson MR
    Br J Surg; 2003 May; 90(5):583-92. PubMed ID: 12734867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding surgeon performance and improving patient outcomes.
    Birkmeyer JD
    J Clin Oncol; 2004 Jul; 22(14):2765-6. PubMed ID: 15199085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgeon volume as a predictor of outcomes in inpatient and outpatient endocrine surgery.
    Stavrakis AI; Ituarte PH; Ko CY; Yeh MW
    Surgery; 2007 Dec; 142(6):887-99; discussion 887-99. PubMed ID: 18063073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Practice makes perfect. The favourable effect of experience on the outcome of care].
    Obertop H
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Jul; 148(27):1327-9. PubMed ID: 15283022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Is the surgeon still the main prognosis factor?].
    Rivoire M; Dupré A
    Bull Cancer; 2013 Oct; 100(10):973-81. PubMed ID: 24103859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome.
    Chowdhury MM; Dagash H; Pierro A
    Br J Surg; 2007 Feb; 94(2):145-61. PubMed ID: 17256810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.