BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10603187)

  • 1. Reclassification of negative smears as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in quality assurance reviews: implications and limitations.
    Stanley DE; Plowden K; Sherman ME
    Cancer; 1999 Dec; 87(6):346-50. PubMed ID: 10603187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ASCUS! ASCUS! down the rabbit hole.
    Frable WJ
    Cancer; 1999 Dec; 87(6):319-21. PubMed ID: 10603184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abnormal pap smears in adolescents.
    Bacon J; Francoeur D; Goldfarb AF; Breech LL
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 16(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 12804941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical cytology screening and management of abnormal cytology in adolescent girls.
    Kahn JA; Hillard PJ; ; ;
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 16(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 12804942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [How technology and vaccination have changed the Pap test].
    Bondi A; Ghidoni D; Amadori A
    Pathologica; 1999 Feb; 91(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 10396949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical carcinoma: role of imaging.
    Yu KK; Forstner R; Hricak H
    Abdom Imaging; 1997; 22(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 9013537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Team Reading (Peer Review) of Suspicious/Positive Slides for Continuous Quality Improvement in Cervical-Vaginal Cytology: A Comparison between Methods and Indicators.
    Placidi A; Capparucci P; Di Luzio A; Manca G; Mania E; Filippini T; Giorgi Rossi P
    Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(5):458-464. PubMed ID: 27504992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Have we resolved how to triage equivocal cervical cytology?
    Solomon D; Schiffman M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):250-1. PubMed ID: 14970266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Could HPV testing become the sole primary cervical screening test?
    Sasieni P; Cuzick J
    J Med Screen; 2002; 9(2):49-51. PubMed ID: 12133918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Borderline nuclear abnormality in cervical smears: a cytological review of 200 cases with histological correlation.
    Stewart CJ; Livingstone D; Mutch AF
    Cytopathology; 1993; 4(6):339-45. PubMed ID: 8110973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in liquid-based cytologic specimens: results of reflex human papillomavirus testing and histologic follow-up in routine practice with comparison of interpretive and probabilistic reporting methods.
    Levi AW; Kelly DP; Rosenthal DL; Ronnett BM
    Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 12925979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monitoring and ordering practices for human papillomavirus in cervical cytology: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 5.
    Booth CN; Bashleben C; Filomena CA; Means MM; Wasserman PG; Souers RJ; Henry MR
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 23368863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities--update 2002].
    Anaes, Service des Recommandations Professionnelles et Service Evaluation Economique
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2003 Nov; 31(11):974-85. PubMed ID: 14623565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A decade has passed...the Pap smear and cervical cancer.
    Linder J
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Nov; 108(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 9353086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is p16(INK4A) expression more useful than human papillomavirus test to determine the outcome of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance-categorized Pap smear? A comparative analysis using abnormal cervical smears with follow-up biopsies.
    Nieh S; Chen SF; Chu TY; Lai HC; Lin YS; Fu E; Gau CH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Apr; 97(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 15790434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Review of the Bethesda System atlas does not improve reproducibility or accuracy in the classification of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance smears.
    Smith AE; Sherman ME; Scott DR; Tabbara SO; Dworkin L; Olson J; Thompson J; Faser C; Snell J; Schiffman M
    Cancer; 2000 Aug; 90(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 10966559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genital human papillomavirus testing by in situ hybridization in liquid atypical cytologic materials and follow-up biopsies.
    Bewtra C; Xie Q; Soundararajan S; Gatalica Z; Hatcher L
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 15839614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in conventional cervical/vaginal smears and thin-layer preparations.
    Hecht JL; Sheets EE; Lee KR
    Cancer; 2002 Feb; 96(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11836696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus in women with abnormal and normal vaginal ThinPrep Papanicolaou cytology.
    Bansal M; Zhao C
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Apr; 15(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 21317806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implications of low diagnostic reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic diagnoses.
    Selvaggi SM
    JAMA; 2001 Mar; 285(11):1506-8. PubMed ID: 11255428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.