158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10603189)
21. Utility of the Thin Prep Imaging System® in the detection of squamous intraepithelial abnormalities on retrospective evaluation: can we trust the imager?
Barroeta JE; Reilly ME; Steinhoff MM; Lawrence WD
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Feb; 40(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 22246928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Papanicolaou tests with mixed high-grade and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion features: distinct performance in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytopathology.
Renshaw AA; Mody DR; Styer P; Schwartz M; Ducatman B; Colgan TJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Apr; 130(4):456-9. PubMed ID: 16594738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. HPV detection rates and histopathologic follow-up of patients with HSIL cytology in a large academic women's hospital laboratory.
Ashman D; Zhang H; Li J; Austin M; Wang T; Pradhan D; Zhao C
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(6):550-555. PubMed ID: 32475726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on Papanicolaou test: follow-up rates and stratification of risk for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Rufail M; Lew M; Pang J; Jing X; Heider A; Cantley RL
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(4):258-265. PubMed ID: 32402830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.
Shain AF; Kwok S; Folkins AK; Kong CS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29112019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of a novel antibody cocktail for detection of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions on cervical cytology specimens.
Tambouret RH; Misdraji J; Wilbur DC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Jun; 132(6):918-25. PubMed ID: 18517273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Clinical value of p16
Song FB; Du H; Xiao AM; Wang C; Huang X; Yan PS; Liu ZH; Qu XF; Belinson JEROMEL; Wu RF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 55(11):784-790. PubMed ID: 33228350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Morphologic analysis of false negative SurePath® slides using Focalpoint™ GS computer-assisted cervical screening technology: An Australian experience.
Bowditch RC; Clarke JM; Baird PJ; Greenberg ML
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Nov; 43(11):870-8. PubMed ID: 26174002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The primary screening clinical trials of the TriPath AutoPap System.
Wilbur DC; Norton MK
Epidemiology; 2002 May; 13 Suppl 3():S30-3. PubMed ID: 12071481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The artificial intelligence-assisted cytology diagnostic system in large-scale cervical cancer screening: A population-based cohort study of 0.7 million women.
Bao H; Sun X; Zhang Y; Pang B; Li H; Zhou L; Wu F; Cao D; Wang J; Turic B; Wang L
Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(18):6896-6906. PubMed ID: 32697872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Detection of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions from cytologic samples using a novel immunocytochemical assay (ProEx C).
Kelly D; Kincaid E; Fansler Z; Rosenthal DL; Clark DP
Cancer; 2006 Dec; 108(6):494-500. PubMed ID: 17063495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Results of AutoPap system-assisted and manual cytologic screening. A comparison.
Wertlake P
J Reprod Med; 1999 Jan; 44(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9987733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The significance of the Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Nasser SM; Cibas ES; Crum CP; Faquin WC
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 14579293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears: a comparison study in an Asian screening population.
Cheung AN; Szeto EF; Leung BS; Khoo US; Ng AW
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):331-5. PubMed ID: 14681939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cytologic features of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions involving endocervical glands on thin-layer cytology.
Selvaggi SM
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(6):689-90. PubMed ID: 16450913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A retrospective validation of the FocalPoint GS slide profiler NFR technology by analysis of interval disease outcomes compared with manual cytology.
Nuttall DS; Hillier S; Clayton HR; Savage AJ; Martin CM; O'Leary JJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Apr; 127(4):240-246. PubMed ID: 30825407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Human papillomavirus detection by PCR assay in a large series of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions with cytohistological correlation and follow-up.
Lerma Puertas E; Otal Salaverri C; Ríos Martín JJ; Sánchez Gómez A; Jiménez Caraballo A; González-Cámpora R
Acta Cytol; 2011; 55(5):426-32. PubMed ID: 21986169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Why is high grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia under-diagnosed on cytology in a quarter of cases? Analysis of smear characteristics in discrepant cases.
Gupta S; Sodhani P
Indian J Cancer; 2004; 41(3):104-8. PubMed ID: 15472407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The interpretation of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on anal cytology: a comparative analysis with the cervical Papanicolaou test.
Patel AP; Schatz-Siemers NF; Dilcher TL; Goyal A
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(6):540-549. PubMed ID: 32800528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after atypical glandular cells in cervical screening: nationwide cohort study.
Wang J; Andrae B; Sundström K; Ström P; Ploner A; Elfström KM; Arnheim-Dahlström L; Dillner J; Sparén P
BMJ; 2016 Feb; 352():i276. PubMed ID: 26869597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
