292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10603197)
1. Analytical resources for assessment of clinical genetics services in public health: current status and future prospects.
Kirby RS
Teratology; 2000; 61(1-2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10603197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Registry to referral: using birth defects registries to refer infants and toddlers for early intervention services.
Farel AM; Meyer RE; Hicken M; Edmonds LD
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):647-50. PubMed ID: 14703788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Birth defects interstate data exchange: a battle worth fighting?
Cassell C; Mai C; Rickard R
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2007 Nov; 79(11):806-10. PubMed ID: 17990342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinician reviewers in birth defects surveillance programs: survey of the National Birth Defects Prevention Network.
Lin AE; Forrester MB; Cunniff C; Higgins CA; Anderka M
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):781-6. PubMed ID: 17051528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical geneticists in birth defects surveillance and epidemiology research programs: past, present and future roles.
Lin AE; Rasmussen SA; Scheuerle A; Stevenson RE
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2009 Jan; 85(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 19107957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hospital discharge data: can it serve as the sole source of case ascertainment for population-based birth defects surveillance programs?
Wang Y; Cross PK; Druschel CM
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 20357611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Children with special health care needs enrolled in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP): patient characteristics and health care needs.
Szilagyi PG; Shenkman E; Brach C; LaClair BJ; Swigonski N; Dick A; Shone LP; Schaffer VA; Col JF; Eckert G; Klein JD; Lewit EM
Pediatrics; 2003 Dec; 112(6 Pt 2):e508. PubMed ID: 14654673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using the Colorado birth defects monitoring program to connect families with services for children with special needs.
Montgomery A; Miller L
Teratology; 2001; 64 Suppl 1():S42-6. PubMed ID: 11745844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2397-406. PubMed ID: 12692171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Collection, use, and protection of population-based birth defects surveillance data in the united states.
Mai CT; Law DJ; Mason CA; McDowell BD; Meyer RE; Musa D;
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2007 Dec; 79(12):811-4. PubMed ID: 18064713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. National evaluation of US newborn screening system components.
Therrell BL; Hannon WH
Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev; 2006; 12(4):236-45. PubMed ID: 17183567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of genetics services: creating an inclusive definition and outcomes menu for public health and clinical genetics services.
Silvey K; Stock J; Hasegawa LE; Au SM
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2009 Aug; 151C(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 19621453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the Birth Defects Monitoring Program, 1982-1985.
Lynberg MC; Chavez GF; Edmonds LD; Mulinare J
Teratology; 1993 Dec; 48(6):650-7. PubMed ID: 8115974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term follow-up data collection and use in state newborn screening programs.
Hoff T; Ayoob M; Therrell BL
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2007 Oct; 161(10):994-1000. PubMed ID: 17909144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrating birth defects surveillance in maternal and child health at the state level.
Klein Walker D
Teratology; 2000; 61(1-2):4-8. PubMed ID: 10603196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Follow-up survey of parents of children with major birth defects in New York State.
Sharpe-Stimac M; Wang Y; Druschel CM; Cross PK
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2004 Sep; 70(9):597-602. PubMed ID: 15368559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methodological issues in setting up a surveillance system for birth defects in India.
Suresh S; Thangavel G; Sujatha J; Indrani S
Natl Med J India; 2005; 18(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 16433142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Birth Defects Monitoring Program (BDMP)/McDonnell Douglas Health Information System (MDHIS) surveillance data, 1985-1988.
Teratology; 1993 Dec; 48(6):676-94. PubMed ID: 8115976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Data integration and warehousing: coordination between newborn screening and related public health programs.
Therrell BL
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2003; 34 Suppl 3():63-8. PubMed ID: 15906697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Population and case-control surveillance in the search for environmental causes of birth defects.
Oakley GP
Public Health Rep; 1984; 99(5):465-8. PubMed ID: 6207556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
