These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10605100)

  • 1. Sample-duration effects on pigeons' delayed matching as a function of predictability of duration.
    Urcuioli PJ; DeMarse TB; Lionello KM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Nov; 72(3):279-97. PubMed ID: 10605100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the effects of signaling reinforcer probability and magnitude in delayed matching to sample.
    Brown GS; White KG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Mar; 83(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 15828590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pigeons may not remember the stimuli that reinforced their recent behavior.
    Schaal DW; Odum AL; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Mar; 73(2):125-39. PubMed ID: 10784005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of outcome delay on suboptimal choice.
    McDevitt MA; Pisklak JM; Spetch M; Dunn R
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():279-285. PubMed ID: 30394293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do pigeons (Columba livia) study for a test?
    Roberts WA; Feeney MC; McMillan N; MacPherson K; Musolino E; Petter M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 19364222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transfer of pigeons' matching to sample to novel sample locations.
    Lionello-DeNolf KM; Urcuioli PJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Mar; 73(2):141-61. PubMed ID: 10784006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Delayed matching-to-sample: A tool to assess memory and other cognitive processes in pigeons.
    Zentall TR; Smith AP
    Behav Processes; 2016 Feb; 123():26-42. PubMed ID: 26165174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of prereinforcer and postreinforcer stimuli.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Nov; 70(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 9821679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-term memory for responses: the "choose-small" effect.
    Fetterman JG; MacEwen D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Nov; 52(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 2584917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of hippocampal and area parahippocampalis lesions in pigeons: I. Delayed matching to sample.
    Colombo M; Swain N; Harper D; Alsop B
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1997 May; 50(2):149-71. PubMed ID: 9225621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pigeons prefer conditional stimuli over their absence: a comment on Roberts et al. (2009).
    Zentall TR; Stagner JP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Oct; 36(4):506-9. PubMed ID: 20718554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of reinforcer delays on the form of the forgetting function.
    Sargisson RJ; White KG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):77-94. PubMed ID: 13677610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of signaled versus unsignaled delay of reinforcement on choice.
    McDevitt MA; Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Mar; 75(2):165-82. PubMed ID: 11394485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
    Smith AP; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maintained generalization of delay-specific remembering.
    White KG; Sargisson RJ
    Behav Processes; 2011 Jul; 87(3):310-3. PubMed ID: 21704683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrospective coding in pigeons' delayed matching-to-sample.
    Urcuioli PJ; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1986 Jan; 12(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 3701260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Context effects on choice.
    Goldshmidt JN; Lattal KM; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Nov; 70(3):301-20. PubMed ID: 9821681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight, but not with food, duration samples in pigeons.
    Grant DS
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 17079092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentuation of the differential outcomes effect by extraneous reward.
    White KG; Millar JG
    Behav Processes; 2014 Oct; 108():7-10. PubMed ID: 25219548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Midsession reversals with pigeons: visual versus spatial discriminations and the intertrial interval.
    Laude JR; Stagner JP; Rayburn-Reeves R; Zentall TR
    Learn Behav; 2014 Mar; 42(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 24043581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.