These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10605105)

  • 1. Support for a theory of memory for event duration must distinguish between test-trial ambiguity and actual memory loss.
    Zentall TR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Nov; 72(3):467-72. PubMed ID: 10605105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Timing in pigeons: effects of the similarity between intertrial interval and gap in a timing signal.
    Kaiser DH; Zentall TR; Neiman E
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Oct; 28(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 12395499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal discrimination learning by pigeons.
    Zentall TR
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 17110057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Timing, memory for intervals, and memory for untimed stimuli: the role of instructional ambiguity.
    Zentall TR
    Behav Processes; 2005 Nov; 70(3):209-22. PubMed ID: 16095851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pigeons' memory for sequences of light flashes: reliance on temporal properties and evidence for delay interval/gap confusion.
    Santi A; Lellwitz J; Gagne S
    Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):128-38. PubMed ID: 16473481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for detection of one duration sample and default responding to other duration samples by pigeons may result from an artifact of retention-test ambiguity.
    Zentall TR; Klein ED; Singer RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Apr; 30(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15078122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Midsession reversals with pigeons: visual versus spatial discriminations and the intertrial interval.
    Laude JR; Stagner JP; Rayburn-Reeves R; Zentall TR
    Learn Behav; 2014 Mar; 42(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 24043581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biasing performance through differential payoff in a temporal bisection task.
    Cambraia R; Vasconcelos M; Jozefowiez J; Machado A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):75-94. PubMed ID: 30604996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of training delays and start and stop markers on the choose-short effect in pigeons.
    Talarico DC; Grant DS
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):98-106. PubMed ID: 16095850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The choose-short effect and trace models of timing.
    Staddon JE; Higa JJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Nov; 72(3):473-8. PubMed ID: 10605106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Choose-long errors at delays shorter than the training delay persist when enhanced between-trial summation of duration memories are precluded in pigeons.
    Grant DS
    Behav Processes; 2009 Nov; 82(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 19683036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal parameters of the feature positive effect.
    Nallan GB; Pace GM; McCoy DF; Zentall TR
    Am J Psychol; 1979 Dec; 92(4):703-10. PubMed ID: 532834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do pigeons (Columba livia) study for a test?
    Roberts WA; Feeney MC; McMillan N; MacPherson K; Musolino E; Petter M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 19364222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shifts in the psychophysical function in rats.
    Guilhardi P; Macinnis ML; Church RM; Machado A
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 17360131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time-sharing in pigeons: Independent effects of gap duration, position and discriminability from the timed signal.
    Buhusi CV; Paskalis JP; Cerutti DT
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):116-25. PubMed ID: 16414210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pigeons show near-optimal win-stay/lose-shift performance on a simultaneous-discrimination, midsession reversal task with short intertrial intervals.
    Rayburn-Reeves RM; Laude JR; Zentall TR
    Behav Processes; 2013 Jan; 92():65-70. PubMed ID: 23123672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short-term memory for responses: the "choose-small" effect.
    Fetterman JG; MacEwen D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Nov; 52(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 2584917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interval timing with gaps: gap ambiguity as an alternative to temporal decay.
    Zentall TR; Kaiser DH
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):484-6. PubMed ID: 16248734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pigeons exhibit higher accuracy for chosen memory tests than for forced memory tests in duration matching-to-sample.
    Adams A; Santi A
    Learn Behav; 2011 Mar; 39(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 21264568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time and memory: towards a pacemaker-free theory of interval timing.
    Staddon JE; Higa JJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Mar; 71(2):215-51. PubMed ID: 10220931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.