BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10605105)

  • 1. Support for a theory of memory for event duration must distinguish between test-trial ambiguity and actual memory loss.
    Zentall TR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Nov; 72(3):467-72. PubMed ID: 10605105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Timing in pigeons: effects of the similarity between intertrial interval and gap in a timing signal.
    Kaiser DH; Zentall TR; Neiman E
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Oct; 28(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 12395499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal discrimination learning by pigeons.
    Zentall TR
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 17110057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Timing, memory for intervals, and memory for untimed stimuli: the role of instructional ambiguity.
    Zentall TR
    Behav Processes; 2005 Nov; 70(3):209-22. PubMed ID: 16095851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pigeons' memory for sequences of light flashes: reliance on temporal properties and evidence for delay interval/gap confusion.
    Santi A; Lellwitz J; Gagne S
    Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):128-38. PubMed ID: 16473481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for detection of one duration sample and default responding to other duration samples by pigeons may result from an artifact of retention-test ambiguity.
    Zentall TR; Klein ED; Singer RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Apr; 30(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15078122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Midsession reversals with pigeons: visual versus spatial discriminations and the intertrial interval.
    Laude JR; Stagner JP; Rayburn-Reeves R; Zentall TR
    Learn Behav; 2014 Mar; 42(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 24043581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biasing performance through differential payoff in a temporal bisection task.
    Cambraia R; Vasconcelos M; Jozefowiez J; Machado A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):75-94. PubMed ID: 30604996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of training delays and start and stop markers on the choose-short effect in pigeons.
    Talarico DC; Grant DS
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):98-106. PubMed ID: 16095850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The choose-short effect and trace models of timing.
    Staddon JE; Higa JJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Nov; 72(3):473-8. PubMed ID: 10605106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Choose-long errors at delays shorter than the training delay persist when enhanced between-trial summation of duration memories are precluded in pigeons.
    Grant DS
    Behav Processes; 2009 Nov; 82(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 19683036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal parameters of the feature positive effect.
    Nallan GB; Pace GM; McCoy DF; Zentall TR
    Am J Psychol; 1979 Dec; 92(4):703-10. PubMed ID: 532834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do pigeons (Columba livia) study for a test?
    Roberts WA; Feeney MC; McMillan N; MacPherson K; Musolino E; Petter M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 19364222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shifts in the psychophysical function in rats.
    Guilhardi P; Macinnis ML; Church RM; Machado A
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 17360131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time-sharing in pigeons: Independent effects of gap duration, position and discriminability from the timed signal.
    Buhusi CV; Paskalis JP; Cerutti DT
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):116-25. PubMed ID: 16414210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pigeons show near-optimal win-stay/lose-shift performance on a simultaneous-discrimination, midsession reversal task with short intertrial intervals.
    Rayburn-Reeves RM; Laude JR; Zentall TR
    Behav Processes; 2013 Jan; 92():65-70. PubMed ID: 23123672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short-term memory for responses: the "choose-small" effect.
    Fetterman JG; MacEwen D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Nov; 52(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 2584917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interval timing with gaps: gap ambiguity as an alternative to temporal decay.
    Zentall TR; Kaiser DH
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):484-6. PubMed ID: 16248734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pigeons exhibit higher accuracy for chosen memory tests than for forced memory tests in duration matching-to-sample.
    Adams A; Santi A
    Learn Behav; 2011 Mar; 39(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 21264568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time and memory: towards a pacemaker-free theory of interval timing.
    Staddon JE; Higa JJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Mar; 71(2):215-51. PubMed ID: 10220931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.