These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1060523)

  • 21. [Surgical reconstruction of velopharyngeal incompetence in postoperative cleft palate patients].
    Li XC; Li SK
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 16(6):420-1. PubMed ID: 12508439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of velopharyngeal competence: a long-term process.
    Van Demark DR; Hardin MA; Morris HL
    Cleft Palate J; 1988 Oct; 25(4):362-73. PubMed ID: 3203467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prospective clinical trial comparing outcome measures between Furlow and von Langenbeck Palatoplasties for UCLP.
    Williams WN; Seagle MB; Pegoraro-Krook MI; Souza TV; Garla L; Silva ML; Machado Neto JS; Dutka JC; Nackashi J; Boggs S; Shuster J; Moorhead J; Wharton W; Graciano MI; Pimentel MC; Feniman M; Piazentin-Penna SH; Kemker J; Zimmermann MC; Bento-Gonçalvez C; Borgo H; Marques IL; Martinelli AP; Jorge JC; Antonelli P; Neves JF; Whitaker ME
    Ann Plast Surg; 2011 Feb; 66(2):154-63. PubMed ID: 21042188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cleft palate repair: Furlow versus von Langenbeck.
    Spauwen PH; Goorhuis-Brouwer SM; Schutte HK
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1992 Jan; 20(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 1564114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Studies on factors affecting velopharyngeal functions of cleft palate patients].
    Huang W; Song YG; Fang Z
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Jan; 18(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 14768086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of Le Fort I osteotomy with maxillary movement on articulation, resonance, and velopharyngeal function.
    Kummer AW; Strife JL; Grau WH; Creaghead NA; Lee L
    Cleft Palate J; 1989 Jul; 26(3):193-9; discussion 199-200. PubMed ID: 2758671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A methodology report of a randomized prospective clinical trial to assess velopharyngeal function for speech following palatal surgery.
    Williams WN; Seagle MB; Nackashi AJ; Marks R; Boggs SR; Kemker J; Wharton W; Bzoch KR; Dixon-Wood V; Pegoraro-Krook MI; de Souza Freitas JA; Garla LA; de Souza TV; Silva ML; Neto JS; Montagnoli LC; Martinelli AP; Marques IL; Zimmerman MC; Feniman MB; de Azevedo Bento Gonçalves CG; Piazentin SH; Graciano MI; Chinellato MC; Jorge JC
    Control Clin Trials; 1998 Jun; 19(3):297-312. PubMed ID: 9620812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of three techniques of palatorrhaphy: early speech results.
    Holtmann B; Wray RC; Weeks PM
    Ann Plast Surg; 1984 Jun; 12(6):514-8. PubMed ID: 6465808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of three technics of palatorrhaphy: in-hospital morbidity.
    Wray C; Dann J; Holtmann B
    Cleft Palate J; 1979 Jan; 16(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 282028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of surgeon experience on velopharyngeal functional outcome following palatoplasty: is there a learning curve?
    Witt PD; Wahlen JC; Marsh JL; Grames LM; Pilgram TK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Oct; 102(5):1375-84. PubMed ID: 9773991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of Von Langenbeck palatoplasty on facial growth.
    Bishara SE; Tharp RM
    Angle Orthod; 1977 Jan; 47(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 264775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the effect of the rotation palatoplasty and V-Y pushback palatoplasty techniques on palate elongation with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Isik D; Bora A; Yuce S; Davran R; Kocak OF; Canbaz Y; Avcu S; Atik B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 44(6):738-44. PubMed ID: 25739665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-term results following the repair of palatal clefts: a comparison of three different techniques.
    Seyfer AE; Simon CD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1989 May; 83(5):785-90; discussion 791-2. PubMed ID: 2710829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prediction of velopharyngeal competency.
    Demark RV; Kuehn DP; Tharp RF
    Cleft Palate J; 1975 Jan; 12(00):5-11. PubMed ID: 1053962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Submucous cleft palate.
    Abyholm FE
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg; 1976; 10(3):209-12. PubMed ID: 1053450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perci: a method for rating palatal efficiency.
    Warren DW
    Cleft Palate J; 1979 Jul; 16(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 287577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Medial Langenbeck: experience of a modified Von Langenbeck repair of the cleft palate. A preliminary report.
    Murison MS; Pigott RW
    Br J Plast Surg; 1992; 45(6):454-9. PubMed ID: 1393249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Results of cleft palate repair with the double-reverse Z-plasty performed by residents.
    Mann EA; Sidman JD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Jul; 111(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 8028947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An evaluation of velopharyngeal ring ligation in cleft palate repair.
    Zhang QH; Zheng JW; Wei FC; Song XY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Jun; 53(6):651-5; discussion 655-6. PubMed ID: 7776047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The orticochea pharyngoplasty and primary palatoplasty: an evaluation.
    Riski JE; Georgiade NG; Serafin D; Barwick W; Georgiade GS; Riefkohl R
    Ann Plast Surg; 1987 Apr; 18(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 3579169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.