These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10605652)

  • 1. Using the continuous quality improvement process to safely lower the cesarean section rate.
    Gregory KD; Hackmeyer P; Gold L; Johnson AI; Platt LD
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1999 Dec; 25(12):619-29. PubMed ID: 10605652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cesarean section rates: effects of participation in a performance measurement project.
    Kazandjian VA; Lied TR
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1998 Apr; 24(4):187-96. PubMed ID: 9589331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of public accountability on hospital performance: trends in rates for cesarean sections and vaginal births after cesarean section in Cleveland, Ohio.
    Caron A; Neuhauser D
    Qual Manag Health Care; 1999; 7(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 10346457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of physician factors on the cesarean section decision.
    Burns LR; Geller SE; Wholey DR
    Med Care; 1995 Apr; 33(4):365-82. PubMed ID: 7731278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A successful program to reduce cesarean section rates: friendly persuasion.
    Myers SA; Gleicher N
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1991 May; 17(5):162-6. PubMed ID: 2052351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The labor-adjusted cesarean section rate--a more informative method than the cesarean section "rate" for assessing a practitioner's labor and delivery skills.
    Elliott JP; Russell MM; Dickason LA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 177(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 9240597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cesarean section rates in low-risk private patients managed by certified nurse-midwives and obstetricians.
    Davis LG; Riedmann GL; Sapiro M; Minogue JP; Kazer RR
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1994; 39(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 8027851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparison of primary cesarean section rates: need, validity and parsimony.
    Fantini MP; Stivanello E; Frammartino B; Barone AP; Fusco D; Dallolio L; Cacciari P; Perucci CA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Aug; 6():100. PubMed ID: 16911770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical application of quality improvement concepts and tools: C-Section process improvement.
    Zimmerman M; Stephens S
    J AHIMA; 1993 Mar; 64(3):63-9. PubMed ID: 10124564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lowering the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: comparison of individual physicians' rates, risk factors, and outcomes.
    Lagrew DC; Adashek JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1207-14. PubMed ID: 9662303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physician cesarean delivery rates and risk-adjusted perinatal outcomes.
    Li T; Rhoads GG; Smulian J; Demissie K; Wartenberg D; Kruse L
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 101(6):1204-12. PubMed ID: 12798526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates.
    Myers SA; Gleicher N
    N Engl J Med; 1988 Dec; 319(23):1511-6. PubMed ID: 3185675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of physician characteristics on clinical behavior: cesarean section in New York State.
    Tussing AD; Wojtowycz MA
    Soc Sci Med; 1993 Nov; 37(10):1251-60. PubMed ID: 8272903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Opinion leaders vs audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. Delivery after previous cesarean section.
    Lomas J; Enkin M; Anderson GM; Hannah WJ; Vayda E; Singer J
    JAMA; 1991 May; 265(17):2202-7. PubMed ID: 2013952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Mount Sinai cesarean section reduction program: an update after 6 years.
    Myers SA; Gleicher N
    Soc Sci Med; 1993 Nov; 37(10):1219-22. PubMed ID: 8272900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physician contribution to a cesarean delivery risk model.
    Luthy DA; Malmgren JA; Zingheim RW; Leininger CJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1579-85; discussion 1585-7. PubMed ID: 12824996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variations in the use of cesarean delivery for dystocia: lessons about the source of care.
    McCloskey L; Petitti DB; Hobel CJ
    Med Care; 1992 Feb; 30(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 1736018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Provider distribution and variations in statewide cesarean section rates.
    Hueston WJ; Lewis-Stevenson S
    J Community Health; 2001 Feb; 26(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11297186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing physician and administrator responses to cesarean section guidelines and actual practice.
    Sonnad SS; Moyer CA; Bernstein SJ
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 2000 Sep; 26(9):515-24. PubMed ID: 10983292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.