These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10605832)

  • 1. The interpretation of "likely" depends on the context, but "70%" is 70%--right? The influence of associative processes on perceived certainty.
    Windschitl PD; Weber EU
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Nov; 25(6):1514-33. PubMed ID: 10605832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Looking Forward and Looking Back: The Likelihood of an Event's Future Reoccurrence Affects Perceptions of the Time It Occurred in the Past.
    Si K; Wyer RS; Dai X
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1577-1587. PubMed ID: 27647621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Binary Additivity of Subjective Probability Does not Indicate the Binary Complementarity of Perceived Certainty.
    Windschitl PD
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2000 Mar; 81(2):195-225. PubMed ID: 10706814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Directional verbal probabilities: inconsistencies between preferential judgments and numerical meanings.
    Honda H; Yamagishi K
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 16955725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Communicating uncertainty in national security intelligence: Expert and nonexpert interpretations of and preferences for verbal and numeric formats.
    Irwin D; Mandel DR
    Risk Anal; 2023 May; 43(5):943-957. PubMed ID: 35994518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Post-decision wagering after perceptual judgments reveals bi-directional certainty readouts.
    Moreira CM; Rollwage M; Kaduk K; Wilke M; Kagan I
    Cognition; 2018 Jul; 176():40-52. PubMed ID: 29544114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Likelihood judgment based on previously observed outcomes: the alternative-outcomes effect in a learning paradigm.
    Windschitl PD; Young ME; Jenson ME
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Apr; 30(3):469-77. PubMed ID: 12061767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expert judgment and uncertainty regarding the protection of imperiled species.
    Heeren A; Karns G; Bruskotter J; Toman E; Wilson R; Szarek H
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Jun; 31(3):657-665. PubMed ID: 27624752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judgments under uncertainty: representativeness or potential surprise?
    Fisk JE
    Br J Psychol; 2002 Nov; 93(Pt 4):431-49. PubMed ID: 12519527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The dud-alternative effect in likelihood judgment.
    Windschitl PD; Chambers JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):198-215. PubMed ID: 14736307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attractors: Incidental values that influence forecasts of change.
    Critcher CR; Rosenzweig EL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Feb; 151(2):475-492. PubMed ID: 34472959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of expert judgment in exposure assessment. Part I. Characterization of personal exposure to benzene.
    Walker KD; Evans JS; MacIntosh D
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2001; 11(4):308-22. PubMed ID: 11571610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Politeness and the communication of uncertainty.
    Holtgraves T; Perdew A
    Cognition; 2016 Sep; 154():1-10. PubMed ID: 27232520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anchoring effects in the judgment of confidence: semantic or numeric priming?
    Carroll SR; Petrusic WM; Leth-Steensen C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 19304619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: the effects of specific emotions on information processing.
    Tiedens LZ; Linton S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Dec; 81(6):973-88. PubMed ID: 11761319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of accuracy motivation on interpretation, comparison, and correction processes: accuracy x knowledge accessibility effects.
    Stapel DA; Koomen W; Zeelenberg M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1998 Apr; 74(4):878-93. PubMed ID: 9569650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Public perception and communication of scientific uncertainty.
    Broomell SB; Kane PB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Feb; 146(2):286-304. PubMed ID: 28134548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of expert judgment in exposure assessment: part 2. Calibration of expert judgments about personal exposures to benzene.
    Walker KD; Catalano P; Hammitt JK; Evans JS
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 13(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 12595879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles.
    Kruglanski AW; Gigerenzer G
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Jan; 118(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 21244188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic Underreproduction of Time Is Independent of Judgment Certainty.
    Riemer M; Rhodes D; Wolbers T
    Neural Plast; 2016; 2016():6890674. PubMed ID: 26881127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.