These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10606194)

  • 1. Differing perspectives on preventive care guidelines: a new look at the mammography controversy.
    Woolf SH; Dickey LL
    Am J Prev Med; 1999 Nov; 17(4):260-8. PubMed ID: 10606194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: the unbalanced view.
    Evans WP; Lee CH; Monsees BS; Monticciolo DL; Rebner M
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):297; author reply 297-8. PubMed ID: 20851949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines are not supported by the scientific evidence.
    Kopans DB
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):294-5; author reply 295. PubMed ID: 20851947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NCI remains committed to current mammography guidelines.
    Von Eschenbach AC
    Oncologist; 2002; 7(3):170-1. PubMed ID: 12065784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The breast cancer screening controversy and the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40-49.
    Kopans DB
    Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 9885578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NCI reverses one expert panel, sides with another.
    Taubes G
    Science; 1997 Apr; 276(5309):27-8. PubMed ID: 9122702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-based advocacy rather than emotion in defense of screening mammography.
    Patti J; Lee C
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):295-6; author reply 296-7. PubMed ID: 20851948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. More mammography muddle: emotions, politics, science, costs, and polarization.
    Berlin L; Hall FM
    Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 20413746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The mammography muddle.
    Rogers LF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1151. PubMed ID: 9129402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Whither scientific deliberation in health policy recommendations? Alice in the Wonderland of breast-cancer screening.
    Fletcher SW
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Apr; 336(16):1180-3. PubMed ID: 9099666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wise words from Drs Berlin and Hall.
    Baines CJ
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):298; author reply 298. PubMed ID: 20851950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confusion about breast-cancer screening.
    Linton OW
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Dec; 337(25):1850. PubMed ID: 9411264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast cancer screening among women younger than age 50: a current assessment of the issues.
    Smith RA
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2000; 50(5):312-36. PubMed ID: 11075240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preserving scientific debate and patient choice: lessons from the Consensus Panel on Mammography Screening. National Institutes of Health.
    Woolf SH; Lawrence RS
    JAMA; 1997 Dec; 278(23):2105-8. PubMed ID: 9403427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you": breast imagers' perspectives regarding screening mammography for others and for themselves--do they practice what they preach?
    Lee J; Gordon PB; Whitman GJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):1336-44. PubMed ID: 26001246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Mammography as a screening test before age 50].
    Segnan N
    Epidemiol Prev; 1997; 21(2):86-7. PubMed ID: 9378186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The public's response to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening.
    Squiers LB; Holden DJ; Dolina SE; Kim AE; Bann CM; Renaud JM
    Am J Prev Med; 2011 May; 40(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 21496748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The 2009 breast cancer screening recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Woolf SH
    JAMA; 2010 Jan; 303(2):162-3. PubMed ID: 20068210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Behavioral consequences of conflict-oriented health news coverage: the 2009 mammography guideline controversy and online information seeking.
    Weeks BE; Friedenberg LM; Southwell BG; Slater JS
    Health Commun; 2012; 27(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 21823950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The politics of breast cancer.
    Watson T
    US News World Rep; 1997 Apr; 122(13):12. PubMed ID: 10166749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.