669 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10608379)
1. The fate of stable cemented acetabular components retained during revision of a femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty.
Berger RA; Quigley LR; Jacobs JJ; Sheinkop MB; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1682-91. PubMed ID: 10608379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years?
Verspeek J; Nijenhuis TA; Kuijpers MFL; Rijnen WHC; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 32898047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment of pelvic osteolysis associated with a stable acetabular component inserted without cement as part of a total hip replacement.
Maloney WJ; Herzwurm P; Paprosky W; Rubash HE; Engh CA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Nov; 79(11):1628-34. PubMed ID: 9384421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study.
Clohisy JC; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Feb; 81(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 10073588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The fate of stable femoral components retained during isolated acetabular revision: a six-to-twelve-year follow-up study.
Moskal JT; Shen FH; Brown TE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Feb; 84(2):250-5. PubMed ID: 11861731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a precoated offset stem. Four to nine-year results.
Cannestra VP; Berger RA; Quigley LR; Jacobs JJ; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Sep; 82(9):1291-9. PubMed ID: 11005520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fate of cementless acetabular components retained during revision total hip arthroplasty.
Beaulé PE; Le Duff MJ; Dorey FJ; Amstutz HC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Dec; 85(12):2288-93. PubMed ID: 14668496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study.
Clohisy JC; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 9973056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Revision of the acetabular component without cement after a previous acetabular reconstruction with use of a bulk femoral head graft in patients who had congenital dislocation or dysplasia. A follow-up note.
Bal BS; Maurer T; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1703-6. PubMed ID: 10608381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention after bipolar hip arthroplasty.
Kaku N; Tabata T; Tagomori H; Tsumura H
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Mar; 137(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 28150224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retention of all-polyethylene acetabular components after femoral revision of a cemented total hip replacement.
Hamlin BR; Rowland C; Morrey BF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Nov; 83(11):1700-5. PubMed ID: 11701794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acetabular revision after failed total hip arthroplasty in patients with congenital hip dislocation and dysplasia. Results after a mean of 8.6 years.
Dearborn JT; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Aug; 82(8):1146-53. PubMed ID: 10954105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A well-fixed femoral stem facing a failed acetabular component: to exchange or not? A 5- to 15-year follow-up study.
de Thomasson E; Conso C; Mazel C
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Feb; 98(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 22245150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The long-term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients who have congenital dislocation, degenerative osteoarthrosis, or rheumatoid arthritis.
Sochart DH; Porter ML
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Nov; 79(11):1599-617. PubMed ID: 9384419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary total hip replacement with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. Follow-up study at an average of six years.
Woolson ST; Haber DF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 May; 78(5):698-705. PubMed ID: 8642026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The fate of well fixed cemented femoral components left in place at the time of revision of the acetabular component.
Peters CL; Kull L; Jacobs JJ; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 May; 79(5):701-6. PubMed ID: 9160942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total hip replacement with a cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component in patients younger than fifty years of age.
Kim YH; Kook HK; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 May; 84(5):770-4. PubMed ID: 12004019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An analysis of stably fixed femoral components retained during revision total hip arthroplasty.
Cho HJ; Han SB; Park JH; Park SW
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1239-44. PubMed ID: 21435820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
