These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10608932)

  • 1. Empowerment of nursing staff for optimal job performance.
    Huddleston D
    J Nurs Adm; 1999 Dec; 29(12):5, 16. PubMed ID: 10608932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Every which way you lose.
    Snell J
    Nurs Times; 1990 Aug 29-Sep 4; 86(35):42. PubMed ID: 2395710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Logjam in the regions.
    Tattam A
    Nurs Times; 1990 Aug 29-Sep 4; 86(35):43. PubMed ID: 2395711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Professional behavior. Evaluation and evolution methods for individuals. 1].
    Podkovyroff R; Baudet G; Gaba C
    Soins; 1991 Nov; (554):35-9. PubMed ID: 1767298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Job evaluation, know the score.
    Buchan J
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 1994; 1(7):23-4. PubMed ID: 7827795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Failed criteria: a verdict on the job evaluation document.
    Jacob D
    Nurs Times; 1977 Oct; 73(41):1579. PubMed ID: 928090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of staff appraisal systems.
    de la Cour J
    Br J Nurs; 1992 May 14-27; 1(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 1617271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The value of fair grading.
    Humphreys J
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 1996 Jun; 3(3):12-3. PubMed ID: 8716227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The external form of the employee performance appraisal].
    Schell W
    Kinderkrankenschwester; 1996 May; 15(5):199. PubMed ID: 8788561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rating nursing performance based on behaviors.
    Springer P; Payne K; Petermann B
    J Nurs Adm; 1998 Jan; 28(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 9451382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In response to: Kahya E. (2006) A revision of a job evaluation system. Journal of Advanced Nursing 56(3), 314-324.
    Ransom E
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Dec; 60(5):570-1; author reply 572-3. PubMed ID: 17973721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the job performance of nursing home staff.
    Sheridan JE; Fairchild TJ; Kaas M
    Nurs Res; 1983; 32(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 6551761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Making performance appraisal work.
    Noble JE
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):21-8. PubMed ID: 2640598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance management. Part 2: performance review and appraisal.
    Amann M
    AAOHN J; 1996 Aug; 44(8):421-2. PubMed ID: 8852241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Nurses' evaluation in the complex psychiatric milieu].
    Labbé P
    Soins Form Pedagog Encadr; 1999; (30):35-7. PubMed ID: 10734988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual performance review.
    Lilley R
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 1997 Jun; 4(3):20-1. PubMed ID: 9313574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does your appraisal system measure up?
    Wilson P; Bodden JS
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 1999 Apr; 6(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 10382522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feedback and efficiency: a staff development model.
    Chu LK; Chu GS
    Nurs Manage; 1991 Feb; 22(2):28-31. PubMed ID: 1990332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How should the government check nurses are fit to practise?
    Duffin C
    Nurs Stand; 2006 Jul 26-Aug 1; 20(46):14-5. PubMed ID: 16898188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review--why and how to do it.
    Jackson SA
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):60-86. PubMed ID: 2640603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.