These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10609810)
1. Breast-cancer screening with ultrasonography. Kopans DB Lancet; 1999 Dec 18-25; 354(9196):2096-7. PubMed ID: 10609810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Previous imaging findings of breast cancers that occurred in combined screening negatives. Han BK; Hahn SY; Ko EY; Shin JH; Kang SS Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e22-8. PubMed ID: 19619968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast imaging: mammography and ultrasonography. Bassett LW; Kim CH Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2001 May; 9(2):251-71, v. PubMed ID: 11493417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Mammography and mammary ultrasonography: which examination sequence is preferable?]. Müller-Schimpfle M; Stern W; Stoll P; Kaiser JW; Claussen CD Rofo; 1997 Oct; 167(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9417262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Error-rates in screening for breast cancer by clinical examination and mammography. Chamberlain J; Clifford RE; Nathan BE; Price JL; Burn I Clin Oncol; 1979 Jun; 5(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 466892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [To the Editors: Comment on the study by Kullmann and Misset "Benefits of mammographic breast cancer screening"]. Laszlo T Orv Hetil; 2010 Dec; 151(49):2032-3, discussion 2033-4.. PubMed ID: 21361059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Point/counterpoint. Ultrasonography is soon likely to become a viable alternative to x-ray mammography for breast cancer screening. Glide-Hurst CK; Maidment AD; Orton CG Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4526-9. PubMed ID: 20964169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Medical information for nurses. Mass screening for breast cancer]. Kluck HM Tijdschr Ziekenverpl; 1987 Nov; 41(22):719-22. PubMed ID: 3424350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Analysis of the results of 137 subclinical breast lesions excisions. Value of ultrasonography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer]. Jacob D; Brombart JC; Muller C; Lefèbvre C; Massa F; Depoerck A J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9091540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Japanese Breast Cancer Society clinical practice guidelines for screening and imaging diagnosis of breast cancer, 2015 edition. Tozaki M; Kuroki Y; Kikuchi M; Kojima Y; Kubota K; Nakahara H; Ito Y; Mukai H Breast Cancer; 2016 May; 23(3):357-66. PubMed ID: 27052720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of ultrasound mammography in palpable breast masses. van Oord JC; van der Vliet AM; Thyn CJ; Mak B; Hoogeboom GJ Rofo; 1991 Jul; 155(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 1854938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The UK breast cancer screening programme: an expensive mistake. Rodgers A J Public Health Med; 1990; 12(3-4):197-204. PubMed ID: 2128025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. On the frontline of screening for breast cancer. D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS Semin Oncol; 2011 Feb; 38(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 21362520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of ultrasound in breast cancer screening. A consensus statement by the European Group for Breast Cancer Screening. Teh W; Wilson AR Eur J Cancer; 1998 Mar; 34(4):449-50. PubMed ID: 9713292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Population screening for breast cancer by mammography in The Netherlands. Expectations, early results, negative effects and conditions for large-scale screening. Hendriks JH; Verbeek AL Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):186-91. PubMed ID: 3896616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Re: Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. Colin C; Schott AM J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Jan; 103(1):77; author reply 77-8. PubMed ID: 21088279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]