These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10609810)

  • 21. Ultrasound is similar to mammography in detecting breast cancer, study shows.
    Mayor S
    BMJ; 2015 Dec; 351():h6925. PubMed ID: 26715161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adjunct sonography and not screening in cancer detection.
    Strano S; Crystal P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Aug; 183(2):539; author reply 539-40. PubMed ID: 15269055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ; Plaisier ML; Fracheboud J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 17219049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The "coming of age" of nonmammographic screening for breast cancer.
    Kuhl CK
    JAMA; 2008 May; 299(18):2203-5. PubMed ID: 18477789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Invitation or summons? UK debate surrounds messages about mammography.
    Savage L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Jul; 101(13):912-3. PubMed ID: 19549956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The value of ultrasonography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Charles R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(2):202. PubMed ID: 9265042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Model of outcomes of screening mammography: women's decisions about screening depend on many factors.
    Lockwood SM; Bruce N; Manaszewicz R
    BMJ; 2005 Aug; 331(7512):351; author reply 351. PubMed ID: 16081456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography.
    Zonderland HM; Coerkamp EG; Hermans J; van de Vijver MJ; van Voorthuisen AE
    Radiology; 1999 Nov; 213(2):413-22. PubMed ID: 10551221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Screening for breast cancer with sonography.
    Carkaci S; Santiago L; Adrada BE; Whitman GJ
    Semin Roentgenol; 2011 Oct; 46(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 22035671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Improvement for evaluation of screening with mammography and ultrasonography].
    Watanabe R; Nasu S; Mori H; Inamura A; Hamada I
    Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():310-3. PubMed ID: 17679204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Contribution of mammography and echography to the diagnosis of breast cancer in Dakar: apropos of 25 cases].
    Diop-Ba S; Badiane M; Niang EH; Ly Ba A; Alfidja A; Favre Y
    Dakar Med; 1997; 42(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 9827132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Risks of false-positive breast cancer screening results.
    Levine D; French L
    J Fam Pract; 1998 Jul; 47(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 9673600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Summary of the updated stage 3 guideline for early detection of breast cancer in Germany 2008].
    Albert US; Altland H; Duda V; Engel J; Geraedts M; Heywang-Köbrunner S; Hölzel D; Kalbheim E; Koller M; König K; Kreienberg R; Kühn T; Lebeau A; Nass-Griegoleit I; Schlake W; Schmutzler R; Schreer I; Schulte H; Schulz-Wendtland R; Wagner U; Kopp I
    Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):455-65. PubMed ID: 18438746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Mass screening for breast cancer: remaining questions].
    Verbeek AL
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1987 Sep; 131(37):1602-4. PubMed ID: 3670448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Is overdiagnosing with 50 percent in mammography screening acceptable?].
    Zahl PH; Maehlen J
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jan; 127(2):207-8; author reply 208. PubMed ID: 17237877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. False-negative breast screening assessment: what lessons can we learn?
    Burrell HC; Evans AJ; Wilson AR; Pinder SE
    Clin Radiol; 2001 May; 56(5):385-8. PubMed ID: 11384136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Value of high resolution sonography in breast cancer screening].
    Madjar H; Makowiec U; Mundinger A; Du Bois A; Kommoss F; Schillinger H
    Ultraschall Med; 1994 Feb; 15(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 8165458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of age and breast density on screening mammograms with false-positive findings.
    Lehman CD; White E; Peacock S; Drucker MJ; Urban N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1651-5. PubMed ID: 10584815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Is there a role for sonography in breast cancer screening?
    Villeirs GM
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):155-8. PubMed ID: 17696079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessment of a scoring system for breast imaging.
    Roche NA; Given-Wilson RM; Thomas VA; Sacks NP
    Br J Surg; 1998 May; 85(5):669-72. PubMed ID: 9635819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.