These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10609810)

  • 41. Clinical audit and standard setting for symptomatic breast imaging in South Thames region.
    Mills P; Foord K; Trevethick P
    Clin Radiol; 1997 Jan; 52(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 9022582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Increased risk of breast cancer in women with false-positive test: the role of misclassification.
    von Euler-Chelpin M; Kuchiki M; Vejborg I
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 38(5):619-22. PubMed ID: 25035157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Indication for and possibilities of gynecological breast sonography after the introduction of mammography screening in Germany].
    Merz E; Eichhorn KH; Madjar H; Hackelöer BJ; Degenhardt F
    Ultraschall Med; 2009 Feb; 30(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 19197819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Efficiency of single-view mammography: rate of interval cancer cases.
    Lundgren B
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1979 Apr; 62(4):799-803. PubMed ID: 285293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Breast Density Legislation: More Evidence is Needed.
    Whitman GJ; Woodtichartpreecha P
    Breast J; 2016 Sep; 22(5):491-2. PubMed ID: 27571966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Mammography of breast tumors in males].
    Mantoni M; Rørdam P; Olesen KP; Engel P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1988 Sep; 150(37):2182-3. PubMed ID: 3206582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Association between guideline adherence and clinical outcome for patients referred for diagnostic breast imaging.
    Vercauteren LD; Kessels AG; van der Weijden T; Severens JL; van Engelshoven JM; Flobbe K
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2010 Dec; 19(6):503-8. PubMed ID: 20551187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reviewing interval cancers: time well spent?
    Lewars MD
    Clin Radiol; 2002 Oct; 57(10):955; author reply 955. PubMed ID: 12413924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Breast cancer screening for women 40 to 49 years of age: what is a clinician to do?
    Gemignani ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):548-9. PubMed ID: 17766597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. 3D mammography shows promise as next breast screening technique.
    Oncology (Williston Park); 2003 Jun; 17(6):814, 900. PubMed ID: 12846125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Causes of erroneous interpretation of breast fluorograms in mass screening of women].
    Dzhancharov DI
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1980 Apr; 25(4):74-5. PubMed ID: 7382765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain.
    Tumyan L; Hoyt AC; Bassett LW
    Breast J; 2005; 11(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 16174154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of participation on the cumulative risk of false-positive recall in a breast cancer screening programme.
    Molins E; Comas M; Román R; Rodríguez-Blanco T; Sala M; Macià F; Murta-Nascimento C; Castells X
    Public Health; 2009 Sep; 123(9):635-7. PubMed ID: 19733372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Some limitations and problems of screening for cancer.
    Lilienfeld AM
    Cancer; 1974 Jun; 33(6):1720-4. PubMed ID: 4835163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The background review for the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.
    Jørgensen KJ; Gøtzsche PC
    Ann Intern Med; 2010 Apr; 152(8):538; author reply 538-9. PubMed ID: 20157097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Breast density and cancer risk].
    Boisserie-Lacroix M
    J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 89(9 Pt 2):1139. PubMed ID: 18772797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Mammographic screening: a reappraisal of benefits and risks.
    Bailar JC
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Mar; 21(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 630747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Perioperative ultrasound examination of the breast in breast cancer].
    Ernst R; Weber A; Bauer KH; Friemann J; Zumtobel V
    Zentralbl Chir; 1990; 115(15):963-75. PubMed ID: 2238972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Usefulness of the "targeted" clinical examination in the screening of breast tumors].
    Guidi R; Marcer C; Rossini M
    Radiol Med; 1991 Mar; 81(3):273-5. PubMed ID: 2014332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Mammography or mammary ultrasonography?].
    Merz E; Weismann CF
    Ultraschall Med; 2000 Jun; 21(3):91-2. PubMed ID: 10929593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.