These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10610519)

  • 1. NIH eyes sweeping reform of peer review.
    Agnew B
    Science; 1999 Nov; 286(5442):1074-6. PubMed ID: 10610519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Science policy. Peer-review critic gets NIH 'rejects'.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2001 Nov; 294(5545):1255-7. PubMed ID: 11701895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NIH grants. Peer review reforms get good review.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1994 Jul; 265(5171):467. PubMed ID: 8036487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NIH tunes up peer review.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1994 Mar; 263(5151):1212-3. PubMed ID: 8122098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reviewing Peer Review at the NIH.
    Lauer MS; Nakamura R
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Nov; 373(20):1893-5. PubMed ID: 26559568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Research funding: peer review at NIH.
    Scarpa T
    Science; 2006 Jan; 311(5757):41. PubMed ID: 16400135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NIH panel to monitor peer review in action.
    Taylor R
    Nature; 1995 Jun; 375(6531):438. PubMed ID: 7777040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Information access. NIH public access policy.
    Zerhouni EA
    Science; 2004 Dec; 306(5703):1895. PubMed ID: 15591188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review: NIH urged to streamline bids..
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Jul; 370(6486):170-1. PubMed ID: 8028655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review at NIH: a conversation with CSR director Toni Scarpa.
    Scarpa T
    Physiologist; 2010 Jun; 53(3):65, 67-9. PubMed ID: 20550006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reinvigorating NIH Grant Peer Review.
    Crotty S; Blish C; Cadwell K; Chi H; Goldrath A; Green D; Kaech SM; Krummel M; Pepper M; Rothlin CV; Wherry EJ;
    Immunity; 2020 Jan; 52(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 31940266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2008 Oct; 135(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 18957192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. American Idol and NIH Grant Review.
    Pagano M
    Cell; 2006 Aug; 126(4):637-8. PubMed ID: 16923379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NIH plans peer-review overhaul.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1997 May; 276(5314):888-9. PubMed ID: 9163031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NIH budget. Peer review under stress.
    Miller G; Couzin J
    Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5823):358-9. PubMed ID: 17446364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. American Idol and NIH grant review--redux.
    Munger K
    Cell; 2006 Nov; 127(4):661-2; author reply 664-5. PubMed ID: 17110320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. NIH needs a makeover.
    Dey SK
    Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5943):944. PubMed ID: 19696331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does NIH shortchange clinicians?
    Marshall E
    Science; 1994 Jul; 265(5168):20-1. PubMed ID: 8016650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review. NIH urged to focus on new ideas, new applicants.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5867):1169. PubMed ID: 18309051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 'No change' while NIH revises peer review.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6634):642. PubMed ID: 9192875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.