These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10610539)

  • 1. NIH. Protests win challenge to peer-review proposal.
    Agnew B
    Science; 1999 Nov; 286(5444):1453-4. PubMed ID: 10610539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Varmus circulates proposal for NIH-backed online venture.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1999 Apr; 284(5415):718. PubMed ID: 10336388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NIH E-biomed proposal: a welcome jolt.
    Lancet; 1999 Jun; 353(9169):1985. PubMed ID: 10376606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NIH tunes up peer review.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1994 Mar; 263(5151):1212-3. PubMed ID: 8122098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes urged in NIH peer review process.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Nov; 372(6503):209. PubMed ID: 7969455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NIH goes back to college for peer review.
    Dolgin E
    Nat Med; 2010 Feb; 16(2):143. PubMed ID: 20134456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review at NIH.
    Osthus RC
    Physiologist; 2007 Oct; 50(5):185, 187. PubMed ID: 17990627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reviewing Peer Review at the NIH.
    Lauer MS; Nakamura R
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Nov; 373(20):1893-5. PubMed ID: 26559568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NIH weighs peer review changes.
    Lang L
    Gastroenterology; 2008 Feb; 134(2):380. PubMed ID: 18242202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cautious welcome to NIH peer review reforms.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):269. PubMed ID: 8183356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NIH grants. Peer review reforms get good review.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1994 Jul; 265(5171):467. PubMed ID: 8036487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NIH eyes sweeping reform of peer review.
    Agnew B
    Science; 1999 Nov; 286(5442):1074-6. PubMed ID: 10610519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overhaul of peer review at NIH.
    Fusaro RM
    Lancet; 1999 Nov; 354(9190):1649. PubMed ID: 10560706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AIDS researchers blast NIH peer review plan.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1999 Sep; 285(5436):2047. PubMed ID: 10523193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NIH announces pilot effort to shorten peer review cycle of research applications.
    J Investig Med; 2006 Mar; 54(2):52. PubMed ID: 16532545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research funding: peer review at NIH.
    Scarpa T
    Science; 2006 Jan; 311(5757):41. PubMed ID: 16400135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. NIH plans peer-review overhaul.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1997 May; 276(5314):888-9. PubMed ID: 9163031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research policy. NIH weighs big changes in peer review.
    Couzin J
    Science; 2007 Dec; 318(5857):1708-9. PubMed ID: 18079373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomedical policy. NIH wins an exemption from HHS peer-review overhaul.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2001 Aug; 293(5533):1234. PubMed ID: 11509695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2008 Oct; 135(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 18957192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.