312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10611878)
1. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty.
Paprosky WG; Greidanus NV; Antoniou J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Dec; (369):230-42. PubMed ID: 10611878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimum 8-year follow-up of revision THA with severe femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems and cortical strut allografts.
Ding ZC; Ling TX; Yuan MC; Qin YZ; Mou P; Wang HY; Zhou ZK
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Apr; 21(1):218. PubMed ID: 32268894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally porous-coated femoral stem.
Sinha RK; Dungy DS; Yeon HB
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jun; 86(6):1254-61. PubMed ID: 15173300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Durability of second-generation extensively porous-coated stems in patients age 50 and younger.
Moyer JA; Metz CM; Callaghan JJ; Hennessy DW; Liu SS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 19727992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty.
Weeden SH; Paprosky WG
J Arthroplasty; 2002 Jun; 17(4 Suppl 1):134-7. PubMed ID: 12068424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. A prospective study with a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
Xenos JS; Callaghan JJ; Heekin RD; Hopkinson WJ; Savory CG; Moore MS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 9973057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The S-ROM hydroxyapatite proximally-coated modular femoral stem in revision hip replacement: results of 397 hips at a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Imbuldeniya AM; Walter WK; Zicat BA; Walter WL
Bone Joint J; 2014 Jun; 96-B(6):730-6. PubMed ID: 24891571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study.
Clohisy JC; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 9973056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone remodeling after a mean of 10 years in diaphyseal cortical defects repaired with femoral revision using bypass fixation of extensively porous-coated stems with high stiffness.
Fukui K; Kaneuji A; Sugimori T; Ichiseki T; Matsumoto T
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 May; 25(4):741-7. PubMed ID: 25556779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cementless Roy-Camille femoral component.
Chen CH; Shih CH; Lin CC; Cheng CK
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1998; 118(1-2):85-8. PubMed ID: 9833114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medial protrusio technique for placement of a porous-coated, hemispherical acetabular component without cement in a total hip arthroplasty in patients who have acetabular dysplasia.
Dorr LD; Tawakkol S; Moorthy M; Long W; Wan Z
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 9973058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty of the hip: minimum 5 years followup.
Moreland JR; Moreno MA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Dec; (393):194-201. PubMed ID: 11764349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revision total hip arthroplasty after removal of a fractured well-fixed extensively porous-coated femoral component using a trephine.
Amanatullah DF; Siman H; Pallante GD; Haber DB; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
Bone Joint J; 2015 Sep; 97-B(9):1192-6. PubMed ID: 26330584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hydroxyapatite-coated total hip femoral components in patients less than fifty years old. Clinical and radiographic results after five to eight years of follow-up.
Capello WN; D'Antonio JA; Feinberg JR; Manley MT
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jul; 79(7):1023-9. PubMed ID: 9234878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimum 10-year results of a tapered cementless hip replacement.
Sakalkale DP; Eng K; Hozack WJ; Rothman RH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 May; (362):138-44. PubMed ID: 10335292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular, Cementless Femoral Stem: Intermediate-Term Follow-Up.
Sivananthan S; Lim CT; Narkbunnam R; Sox-Harris A; Huddleston JI; Goodman SB
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Apr; 32(4):1245-1249. PubMed ID: 27923596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Contemporary Triple-Tapered Titanium Stem.
Carlson SW; Goetz DD; Liu SS; Greiner JJ; Callaghan JJ
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2231-6. PubMed ID: 27339824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term Bone Remodeling in HA-coated Stems: A Radiographic Review of 208 Total Hip Arthroplasties (THAs) with 15 to 20 Years Follow-up.
Boldt JG; Cartillier JC; Machenaud A; Vidalain JP
Surg Technol Int; 2015 Nov; 27():279-86. PubMed ID: 26680411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Omnifit cementless total hip arthroplasty. A 10-year average followup.
Hellman EJ; Capello WN; Feinberg JR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Jul; (364):164-74. PubMed ID: 10416406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
