These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10612915)

  • 1. The effects of the coupling of titanium implants and dissimilar metal abutments on osteoblast differentiation in vitro.
    Taylor JC; Anderson GI; Sutow EJ; Driscoll CF; Mackey DC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):785-97. PubMed ID: 10612915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nitric acid passivation does not affect in vitro biocompatibility of titanium.
    Faria AC; Beloti MM; Rosa AL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):820-5. PubMed ID: 14696657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On cobalt-chrome frameworks in implant dentistry.
    Hjalmarsson L
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2009; (201):3-83. PubMed ID: 20143574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
    Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
    Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of a niobium-containing titanium alloy on osteoblast behavior in culture.
    Shapira L; Klinger A; Tadir A; Wilensky A; Halabi A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):578-82. PubMed ID: 19530314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduced corrosion of CP Ti and Ti-6A1-4V alloy endosseous dental implants after glow-discharge treatment: a preliminary report.
    Vargas E; Baier RE; Meyer AE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 1289259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fit of cast commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy crowns before and after marginal refinement by electrical discharge machining.
    Contreras EF; Henriques GE; Giolo SR; Nobilo MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 12473994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments.
    Gulizio MP; Agar JR; Kelly JR; Taylor TD
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15733129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of casting procedures on rotational misfit in castable abutments.
    Kano SC; Binon PP; Bonfante G; Curtis DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):575-9. PubMed ID: 17929518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of metal ions released from different dental implant-abutment couples on osteoblast function and secretion of bone resorbing mediators.
    Alrabeah GO; Brett P; Knowles JC; Petridis H
    J Dent; 2017 Nov; 66():91-101. PubMed ID: 28800964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The implant-abutment interface of alumina and zirconia abutments.
    Yüzügüllü B; Avci M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 18218054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
    Goossens IC; Herbst D
    SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.
    Martin WC; Woody RD; Miller BH; Miller AW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11458261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
    Byrne D; Jacobs S; O'Connell B; Houston F; Claffey N
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16681498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A 4-year prospective study to assess peri-implant hard and soft tissues adjacent to titanium versus gold-alloy abutments in cemented single implant crowns.
    Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(4):250-6. PubMed ID: 16827738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sphene ceramics for orthopedic coating applications: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Ramaswamy Y; Wu C; Dunstan CR; Hewson B; Eindorf T; Anderson GI; Zreiqat H
    Acta Biomater; 2009 Oct; 5(8):3192-204. PubMed ID: 19457458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.