207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10612919)
1. Clinical and histologic evaluation of submerged and nonsubmerged hydroxyapatite-coated implants: a preliminary study in dogs.
Kohal RJ; De LaRosa M; Patrick D; Hürzeler MB; Caffesse RG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):824-34. PubMed ID: 10612919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of submerged and nonsubmerged implants placed without flap reflection in the canine mandible.
Choi BH; Li J; Kim HS; Ko CY; Jeong SM; Xuan F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 May; 105(5):561-5. PubMed ID: 18299237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Submerged or non-submerged healing of endosseous implants to be used in the rehabilitation of partially dentate patients.
Cecchinato D; Olsson C; Lindhe J
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 15016259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog.
Botticelli D; Berglundh T; Persson LG; Lindhe J
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 15842258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Buser D; Schenk RK; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1412-24. PubMed ID: 11022770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implants placed in an irradiated dog mandible: a morphometric analysis.
Brogniez V; D'Hoore W; Grégoire V; Munting E; Reychler H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):511-8. PubMed ID: 10960984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histologic and histomorphometric comparison of immediately placed hydroxyapatite-coated and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a pilot study in dogs.
Karabuda C; Sandalli P; Yalcin S; Steflik DE; Parr GR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):510-5. PubMed ID: 10453665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A radiographic evaluation of bone healing around submerged and non-submerged dental implants in beagle dogs.
Fiorellini JP; Buser D; Paquette DW; Williams RC; Haghighi D; Weber HP
J Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 70(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 10225540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Guided bone regeneration utilizing expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in combination with submerged and nonsubmerged dental implants in beagle dogs.
Fiorellini JP; Engebretson SP; Donath K; Weber HP
J Periodontol; 1998 May; 69(5):528-35. PubMed ID: 9623895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Regeneration procedures in immediate transmucosal implants: an animal study.
Alliot B; Piotrowski B; Marin P; Zahedi S; Brunel G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):841-8. PubMed ID: 10612921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone remodeling adjacent to Morse cone-connection implants with platform switch: a fluorescence study in the dog mandible.
de Oliveira RR; Novaes AB; Taba M; Papalexiou V; Muglia VA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 19492641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osseointegration of one-piece zirconia implants compared with a titanium implant of identical design: a histomorphometric study in the dog.
Koch FP; Weng D; Krämer S; Biesterfeld S; Jahn-Eimermacher A; Wagner W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Mar; 21(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 20074240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible.
Novaes AB; Souza SL; de Oliveira PT; Souza AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 12074453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone response to loaded implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters in the canine mandible.
Cochran DL; Bosshardt DD; Grize L; Higginbottom FL; Jones AA; Jung RE; Wieland M; Dard M
J Periodontol; 2009 Apr; 80(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 19335081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Cochran DL; Nummikoski PV; Buser D
J Periodontol; 1997 Nov; 68(11):1117-30. PubMed ID: 9407406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Histological study of the dental implant-bone interface remodeling of submerged and nonsubmerged implants in dogs].
Yuan L; Zhou WD; Ma XX; Jin Y
Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2003 Jan; 23(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 12527525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histomorphometrical and clinical comparison of submerged and nonsubmerged implants subjected to experimental peri-implantitis in dogs.
Zechner W; Kneissel M; Kim S; Ulm C; Watzek G; Plenk H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Feb; 15(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 14731174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone healing at implants with a fluoride-modified surface: an experimental study in dogs.
Berglundh T; Abrahamsson I; Albouy JP; Lindhe J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17269959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Osseointegration of titanium implants in bone regenerated in membrane-protected defects: a histologic study in the canine mandible.
Buser D; Ruskin J; Higginbottom F; Hardwick R; Dahlin C; Schenk RK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(6):666-81. PubMed ID: 8530169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 9425758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
