439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10613312)
1. Influence of patient positioning on dose-volume histogram and normal tissue complication probability for small bowel and bladder in patients receiving pelvic irradiation: a prospective study using a 3D planning system and a radiobiological model.
Koelbl O; Richter S; Flentje M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Dec; 45(5):1193-8. PubMed ID: 10613312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of treatment technique on dose-volume histogram and normal tissue complication probability for small bowel and bladder. A prospective study using a 3-D planning system and a radiobiological model in patients receiving postoperative pelvic irradiation.
Kölbl O; Richter S; Flentje M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2000 Mar; 176(3):105-11. PubMed ID: 10742830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A phase II trial for the optimisation of treatment position in the radiation therapy of prostate cancer.
O'Neill L; Armstrong J; Buckney S; Assiri M; Cannon M; Holmberg O
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 18453021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of set up variations and bowel volumes in supine versus prone positions of patients treated with external beam radiation for carcinoma rectum.
Rajeev KR; Menon SS; Beena K; Holla R; Kumar RR; Dinesh M
J Cancer Res Ther; 2014; 10(4):937-41. PubMed ID: 25579532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative radiation treatment for rectal cancer: comparison of target coverage and small bowel NTCP in conventional vs. 3D-conformal planning.
Cella L; Ciscognetti N; Martin G; Liuzzi R; Punzo G; Solla R; Farella A; Salvatore M; Pacelli R
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 19181259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Volumetric and dosimetric comparison of organs at risk between the prone and supine positions in postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Sawayanagi S; Yamashita H; Ogita M; Kiritoshi T; Nakamoto T; Abe O; Nakagawa K
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Apr; 13(1):70. PubMed ID: 29665832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduced dose to small bowel with the prone position and a belly board versus the supine position in neoadjuvant 3D conformal radiotherapy for rectal adenocarcinoma.
White R; Foroudi F; Sia J; Marr MA; Lim Joon D
J Med Radiat Sci; 2017 Jun; 64(2):120-124. PubMed ID: 27741381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of treatment position, prone or supine, on dose-volume histograms for pelvic radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.
Drzymala M; Hawkins MA; Henrys AJ; Bedford J; Norman A; Tait DM
Br J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 82(976):321-7. PubMed ID: 19188240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized trial of supine vs. prone positioning in patients undergoing escalated dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Bayley AJ; Catton CN; Haycocks T; Kelly V; Alasti H; Bristow R; Catton P; Crook J; Gospodarowicz MK; McLean M; Milosevic M; Warde P
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Jan; 70(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 15036850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of position and radiation technique on organs at risk in radiotherapy of rectal cancer.
Wang JF; Li H; Xiong H; Huang H; Zou YM
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2016 Oct; 36(5):741-746. PubMed ID: 27752904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A treatment planning study of prone vs. supine positions for locally advanced rectal carcinoma : Comparison of 3‑dimensional conformal radiotherapy, tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Scobioala S; Kittel C; Niermann P; Wolters H; Susek KH; Haverkamp U; Eich HT
Strahlenther Onkol; 2018 Nov; 194(11):975-984. PubMed ID: 29855667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does prone positioning reduce small bowel dose in pelvic radiation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for gynecologic cancer?
Adli M; Mayr NA; Kaiser HS; Skwarchuk MW; Meeks SL; Mardirossian G; Paulino AC; Montebello JF; Gaston RC; Sorosky JI; Buatti JM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Sep; 57(1):230-8. PubMed ID: 12909238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Small bowel protection in IMRT for rectal cancer : A dosimetric study on supine vs. prone position.
Koeck J; Kromer K; Lohr F; Baack T; Siebenlist K; Mai S; Büttner S; Fleckenstein J; Wenz F
Strahlenther Onkol; 2017 Jul; 193(7):578-588. PubMed ID: 28220185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prone Positioning on a Belly Board Decreases Rectal and Bowel Doses in Pelvic Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Prostate Cancer.
Kószó R; Varga L; Fodor E; Kahán Z; Cserháti A; Hideghéty K; Együd Z; Szabó C; Borzási E; Szabó D; Müllner K; Varga Z; Maráz A
Pathol Oncol Res; 2019 Jul; 25(3):995-1002. PubMed ID: 29882196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient positioning in prostate radiotherapy: is prone better than supine?
Weber DC; Nouet P; Rouzaud M; Miralbell R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 May; 47(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 10802361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of pancreatic cancer tumors with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using the volume at risk approach (VARA): employing dose-volume histogram (DVH) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) to evaluate small bowel toxicity.
Landry JC; Yang GY; Ting JY; Staley CA; Torres W; Esiashvili N; Davis LW
Med Dosim; 2002; 27(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 12074463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation therapy of the pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma: a prospective three-dimensional analysis of patient positioning and treatment technique.
Weiss E; Richter S; Hess CF
Radiother Oncol; 2003 Jul; 68(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 12885451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.
Luxton G; Hancock SL; Boyer AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 15093924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of a belly board device with CT-simulation in reducing small bowel volume within pelvic irradiation fields.
Das IJ; Lanciano RM; Movsas B; Kagawa K; Barnes SJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Aug; 39(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 9300741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal Patient Positioning (Prone Versus Supine) for VMAT in Gynecologic Cancer: A Dosimetric Study on the Effect of Different Margins.
Heijkoop ST; Westerveld H; Bijker N; Feije R; Sharfo AW; van Wieringen N; Mens JWM; Stalpers LJA; Hoogeman MS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Oct; 96(2):432-439. PubMed ID: 27598808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
