172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10613383)
1. Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the multipeak (MPEAK) and spectral peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies II. Consonants.
Skinner MW; Fourakis MS; Holden TA; Holden LK; Demorest ME
Ear Hear; 1999 Dec; 20(6):443-60. PubMed ID: 10613383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies. I. Vowels.
Skinner MW; Fourakis MS; Holden TA; Holden LK; Demorest ME
Ear Hear; 1996 Jun; 17(3):182-97. PubMed ID: 8807261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies.
Donaldson GS; Nelson DA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1645-58. PubMed ID: 10738818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech recognition with the nucleus 24 SPEAK, ACE, and CIS speech coding strategies in newly implanted adults.
Skinner MW; Holden LK; Whitford LA; Plant KL; Psarros C; Holden TA
Ear Hear; 2002 Jun; 23(3):207-23. PubMed ID: 12072613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System.
Skinner MW; Clark GM; Whitford LA; Seligman PM; Staller SJ; Shipp DB; Shallop JK; Everingham C; Menapace CM; Arndt PL
Am J Otol; 1994 Nov; 15 Suppl 2():15-27. PubMed ID: 8572106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrodographic analysis and field evaluation of the Speak coding strategy.
Dillier N; Bögli H; Lai WK
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():354-6. PubMed ID: 7668703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech recognition with the MPEAK and SPEAK speech-coding strategies of the Nucleus Cochlear Implant.
Holden LK; Skinner MW; Holden TA
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Feb; 116(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 9051058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acoustic and electrical pattern analysis of consonant perceptual cues used by cochlear implant users.
Teoh SW; Neuburger HS; Svirsky MA
Audiol Neurootol; 2003; 8(5):269-85. PubMed ID: 12904682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS speech coding strategy (MED-EL Combi-40) compared to the multipeak and spectral peak strategies (nucleus).
Kiefer J; Müller J; Pfennigdorff T; Schön F; Helms J; von Ilberg C; Baumgartner W; Gstöttner W; Ehrenberger K; Arnold W; Stephan K; Thumfart W; Baur S
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1996; 58(3):127-35. PubMed ID: 8797215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nucleus 24 advanced encoder conversion study: performance versus preference.
Skinner MW; Arndt PL; Staller SJ
Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):2S-17S. PubMed ID: 11883765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of formant bandwidth on the identification of synthetic vowels by cochlear implant recipients.
Hawks JW; Fourakis MS; Skinner MW; Holden TA; Holden LK
Ear Hear; 1997 Dec; 18(6):479-87. PubMed ID: 9416450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of speech-coding strategy on cortical activity in cochlear implant users: a positron emission tomographic study.
Fujiki N; Naito Y; Hirano S; Kojima H; Kamoto Y; Nishizawa S; Konishi J; Honjo I
Acta Otolaryngol; 1998 Nov; 118(6):797-802. PubMed ID: 9870622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech perception in children using the advanced Speak speech-processing strategy.
Cowan RS; Brown C; Whitford LA; Galvin KL; Sarant JZ; Barker EJ; Shaw S; King A; Skok M; Seligman PM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():318-21. PubMed ID: 7668688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multicentric field evaluation of a new speech coding strategy for cochlear implants.
Dillier N; Battmer RD; Döring WH; Müller-Deile J
Audiology; 1995; 34(3):145-59. PubMed ID: 8561692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.
Fu QJ; Shannon RV; Wang X
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3586-96. PubMed ID: 9857517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of dynamic range and amplitude mapping on phoneme recognition in Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.
Fu QJ; Shannon RV
Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 10890731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Japanese-language results for the speak strategy from Cochlear Pty Limited.
Funasaka S; Shiroma M; Yukawa K
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():265-8. PubMed ID: 7668663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conversion from the SPEAK to the ACE strategy in children using the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception and speech production outcomes.
Psarros CE; Plant KL; Lee K; Decker JA; Whitford LA; Cowan RS
Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):18S-27S. PubMed ID: 11885571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
Zeng FG; Galvin JJ
Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 10037066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
