355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10615167)
1. [Evaluating the results of nursing care. From concept to practice].
Soins; 1999; (637):15-7. PubMed ID: 10615167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluating the results of nursing care. A proceeding inscribed in time].
Soins; 1999; (637):11-4. PubMed ID: 10615166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluating the results of nursing care. Use of the results in 8 questions].
Soins; 1999; (637):18-9. PubMed ID: 10615168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nursing outcomes classification: a preliminary report of field testing.
Maas ML; Reed D; Reeder KM; Kerr P; Specht J; Johnson M; Moorhead S
Outcomes Manag; 2002; 6(3):112-9. PubMed ID: 12134374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluating the results of nursing care. Let us appropriate the results that speak for our practice].
Pascal A
Soins; 1999; (637):24. PubMed ID: 10615170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of nursing on patient and organizational outcomes.
Joseph AM
Nurs Econ; 2007; 25(1):30-4, 3. PubMed ID: 17402676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Measure of nursing care results: user satisfaction].
Morin D
Rech Soins Infirm; 1999 Sep; (58):95-102. PubMed ID: 12038268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nursing-sensitive care measures: a platform for value and vision.
Smith AP
Nurs Econ; 2007; 25(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17402680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Nursing outcomes accountability. Moving to measurement.
Maas ML; Head B
Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract; 1998; 2(4):139-42. PubMed ID: 9919296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing two nursing outcomes reporting initiatives.
Kerr P
Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract; 2000; 4(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 11299584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring nursing.
Nielsen GH
WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 1997; 74():241-55. PubMed ID: 9311297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Contextual variables and assessment of the outcome effects of nursing interventions.
Maas ML; Delaney C; Huber D
Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract; 1999; 3(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 9934191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Revisiting the evaluation of clinical practice.
Leach MJ
Int J Nurs Pract; 2007 Apr; 13(2):70-4. PubMed ID: 17394513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evolution of the mid range theory of comfort for outcomes research.
Kolcaba K
Nurs Outlook; 2001; 49(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 11309563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [A new standardizing tool for all nurses. Interview by Bernadette Fabregas].
Fresny CD; Stinghlamber B
Soins; 1999; (637):8-10. PubMed ID: 10615165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring the outcomes of school nursing practice: showing that school nurses do make a difference.
Denehy J
J Sch Nurs; 2000 Feb; 16(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 11033670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes analysis: methods and issues.
Jones KR
Nurs Econ; 1993; 11(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 8345879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementing the Nursing Outcomes Classification in a practice setting.
Johnson M; Maas M
Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract; 1998; 2(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 9775915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Establishing the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of NOC in an adult care nurse practitioner setting.
Keenan G; Barkauskas V; Stocker J; Johnson M; Maas M; Moorhead S; Reed D
Outcomes Manag; 2003; 7(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 12715604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk adjustment in nursing effectiveness research.
Maas ML; Kerr P
Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract; 1999; 3(2):50-2. PubMed ID: 10427238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
