These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

51 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10615363)

  • 1. [Proficiency test in clinical mammography. Results of a consecutive series of 130 volunteer Italian radiologists].
    Ciatto S; Andreoli C; Di Maggio C
    Radiol Med; 1999 Oct; 98(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 10615363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of the results of a proficiency test in screening mammography at the CSPO of Florence: review of 705 tests.
    Ciatto S; Ambrogetti D; Morrone D; Del Turco MR
    Radiol Med; 2006 Sep; 111(6):797-803. PubMed ID: 16896561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proficiency test for screening mammography: results for 117 volunteer Italian radiologists.
    Ciatto S; Ambrogetti D; Catarzi S; Morrone D; Rosselli Del Turco M
    J Med Screen; 1999; 6(3):149-51. PubMed ID: 10572846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Test for the assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of mammography. Results of 103 tests carried out by Italian radiologists].
    Ciatto S; Rosselli Del Turco M; Ambrogetti D; Catarzi S; Morrone D
    Radiol Med; 1996 Oct; 92(4):367-71. PubMed ID: 9045233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Assessment of diagnostic accuracy of mammography carried out for secondary prevention. Results of a test with a sample caseload conducted by 75 Italian radiologists].
    Morrone D; Giorgi D; Ciatto S; Frigerio A; Catarzi S; Rosselli Del Turco M
    Radiol Med; 2001; 101(1-2):44-7. PubMed ID: 11360752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two commercial systems for computer-assisted detection (CAD) as an aid to interpreting screening mammograms.
    Ciatto S; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Brancato B; Catarzi S; Risso G; Rosselli Del Turco M
    Radiol Med; 2004; 107(5-6):480-8. PubMed ID: 15195010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The procedures and results of a quality control program in mammography carried out on a regional basis].
    Milano F; Rosselli Del Turco M; Maggi E; Certo N; Morrone D; Lazzeri B
    Radiol Med; 1996 Mar; 91(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 8628928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-aided detection (CAD) of cancers detected on double reading by one reader only.
    Ciatto S; Ambrogetti D; Collini G; Cruciani A; Ercolini E; Risso G; Rosselli Del Turco M
    Breast; 2006 Aug; 15(4):528-32. PubMed ID: 16236517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Should surgeons as well as radiologists report mammograms in symptomatic patients?
    Vidya R; Dixon JM
    Breast; 2001 Apr; 10(2):140-2. PubMed ID: 14965574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography self-evaluation online test for screening readers: an Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) initiative.
    Brancato B; Peruzzi F; Saieva C; Schiaffino S; Catarzi S; Risso GG; Cozzi A; Carriero S; Calabrese M; Montemezzi S; Zuiani C; Sardanelli F
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Mar; 32(3):1624-1633. PubMed ID: 34480624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Career caseload predicts interobserver agreement on the final classification of a mammogram.
    Abdelrahman MA; Rawashdeh MA; McEntee M; Abu Tahoun L; Brennan P
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Apr; 63(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30706631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast screening: PERFORMS identifies key mammographic training needs.
    Scott HJ; Gale AG
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S127-33. PubMed ID: 17209118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reading screening mammograms--attitudes among radiologists and radiographers about skill mix.
    Johansen LW; Brodersen J
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):e325-30. PubMed ID: 21227618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of mammographic image quality: pilot study comparing five methods.
    Caldwell CB; Fishell EK; Jong RA; Weiser WJ; Yaffe MJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Aug; 159(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 1632343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation of radiologist rank as a measure of skill in screening and diagnostic interpretation of mammograms.
    Beam CA; Conant EF; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 2006 Feb; 238(2):446-53. PubMed ID: 16436811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiographers as film readers in screening mammography: an assessment of competence under test and screening conditions.
    Pauli R; Hammond S; Cooke J; Ansell J
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):10-4. PubMed ID: 8785616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The professional quality criteria of Italian breast screening radiologists: results from a national survey comparing the programmes started in 2000-2012 versus the ones started in 1990-1999.
    Morrone D; Giordano L; Artuso F; Bernardi D; Fedato C; Frigerio A; Giorgi D; Naldoni C; Saguatti G; Severi D; Taffurelli M; Terribile D; Ventura L; Bucchi L
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2017; 53(2):163-166. PubMed ID: 28617264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is radiologists' volume of mammography reading related to accuracy? A critical review of the literature.
    Moss SM; Blanks RG; Bennett RL
    Clin Radiol; 2005 Jun; 60(6):623-6. PubMed ID: 16038688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.