These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10615434)

  • 1. Factors affecting the clinical testing of accommodative facility.
    Kedzia B; Pieczyrak D; Tondel G; Maples WC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 Jan; 19(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 10615434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Random Changes of Accommodation Stimuli: An Automated Extension of the Flippers Accommodative Facility Test.
    Otero C; Aldaba M; López S; Díaz-Doutón F; Vera-Díaz FA; Pujol J
    Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jun; 43(6):788-795. PubMed ID: 29488815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accommodative facility test results and academic success in Polish second graders.
    Kedzia B; Tondel G; Pieczyrak D; Maples WC
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1999 Feb; 70(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 10457688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examining the Validity of a New Method for the Objective Assessment of Binocular Accommodative Facility (2Q-AF Test): A Comparison with ± 2.00 DS Lens Flippers.
    Vera J; Redondo B; Koulieris GA; Molina R; Jiménez R
    Curr Eye Res; 2022 Jan; 47(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 34612106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Test-retest reproducibility of accommodative facility measures in primary school children.
    Adler P; Scally AJ; Barrett BT
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Nov; 101(6):764-770. PubMed ID: 29740867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [One-year longitudinal change in parameters of myopic school children trained by a new accommodative training device--uncorrected visual acuity, refraction, axial length, accommodation, and pupil reaction].
    Watanabe K; Hara N; Kimijima M; Kotegawa Y; Ohno K; Arimoto A; Mukuno K; Hisahara S; Horie H
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2012 Oct; 116(10):929-36. PubMed ID: 23285840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binocular vision anomalies and normative data (BAND) in Tamil Nadu: report 1.
    Hussaindeen JR; Rakshit A; Singh NK; Swaminathan M; George R; Kapur S; Scheiman M; Ramani KK
    Clin Exp Optom; 2017 May; 100(3):278-284. PubMed ID: 27796049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical assessment of accommodative facility in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.
    Levine S; Ciuffreda KJ; Selenow A; Flax N
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1985 Apr; 56(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 3989210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The diagnostic accuracy of the IFLIP system for binocular visual function anomalies assessment.
    Wang JY; Chen XR; Peng S; Zhu L
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Jun; 27(12):5620-5626. PubMed ID: 37401300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical accommodation testing.
    Goss DA
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 1992 Feb; 3(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 10149307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accommodative facility: a study of young adults.
    Garzia RP; Richman JE
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1982 Oct; 53(10):821-5. PubMed ID: 7142635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study of computer-based and standard clinical accommodative facility testing methods.
    Rouse MW; Freestone GM; Weiner BA; De Land PN
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Feb; 68(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 2027658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accommodative and vergence difficulties interfering with image clarity through a binocular indirect ophthalmoscope.
    Winters JE; Frantz KA; Kern RM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Apr; 81(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 15097768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of accommodative facility using MEM retinoscopy.
    Gallaway M; Scheiman M
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1990 Jan; 61(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 2319091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of accommodative facility testing reliability.
    McKenzie KM; Kerr SR; Rouse MW; DeLand PN
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1987 Mar; 64(3):186-94. PubMed ID: 3578484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of accommodative facility training on a group of children with impaired relative accommodation--a comparison between dioptric treatment and sham treatment.
    Sterner B; Abrahamsson M; Sjöström A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Nov; 21(6):470-6. PubMed ID: 11727875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Children's Accommodation to a Variety of Targets - A Pilot Study.
    Ludden SM; Horwood AM; Riddell PM
    Strabismus; 2017 Sep; 25(3):95-100. PubMed ID: 28759309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical testing of accommodative facility: part III. Masked assessment of the relation between visual symptoms and binocular test results in school children and adults.
    Wick B; Gall R; Yothers T
    Optometry; 2002 Mar; 73(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 12365701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variation and correlation of clinical tests of accommodative function in a sample of school-age children.
    Jackson TW; Goss DA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Nov; 62(11):857-66. PubMed ID: 1813515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamics of accommodative facility in myopes.
    Radhakrishnan H; Allen PM; Charman WN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 48(9):4375-82. PubMed ID: 17724230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.