148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10615440)
1. Positive predictive value of optometrist-initiated referrals for glaucoma.
Theodossiades J; Murdoch I
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 Jan; 19(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 10615440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Glaucoma case finding: a cluster-randomised intervention trial.
Theodossiades J; Murdoch I; Cousens S
Eye (Lond); 2004 May; 18(5):483-90. PubMed ID: 15131679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of optometrist glaucoma referrals against published guidelines.
Khan S; Clarke J; Kotecha A
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):472-7. PubMed ID: 23009293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do locally agreed guidelines for optometrists concerning the referral of glaucoma suspects influence referral practice?
Vernon SA; Ghosh G
Eye (Lond); 2001 Aug; 15(Pt 4):458-63. PubMed ID: 11767019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Glaucoma screening by optometrists: positive predictive value of visual field testing.
Newman DK; Anwar S; Jordan K
Eye (Lond); 1998; 12 ( Pt 6)():921-4. PubMed ID: 10325986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ophthalmology referrals from optometry: a comparative study (the R.O.C.S study).
McLaughlin CR; Biehl M; Chan BJ; Mullen SJ; Zhao L; Donaldson L; Sivachandran N; Moinul P; Barbosa J; Chaudhary V
Can J Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 53(5):491-496. PubMed ID: 30340717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cambridge community Optometry Glaucoma Scheme.
Keenan J; Shahid H; Bourne RR; White AJ; Martin KR
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 43(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 25070417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of glaucoma referral refinement criteria on referral to, and first-visit discharge rates from, the hospital eye service: the Health Innovation & Education Cluster (HIEC) Glaucoma Pathways project.
Ratnarajan G; Newsom W; French K; Kean J; Chang L; Parker M; Garway-Heath DF; Bourne RR
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 23406492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective study on effectiveness of elevated intraocular pressure as a criterion for glaucoma referrals by optometric practitioners in Sweden.
Landgren K; Peters D
Acta Ophthalmol; 2021 Nov; 99(7):e1098-e1105. PubMed ID: 33423398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of referral refinement on management of glaucoma suspects in Australia.
Huang J; Yapp M; Hennessy MP; Ly A; Masselos K; Agar A; Kalloniatis M; Zangerl B
Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Sep; 103(5):675-683. PubMed ID: 31852027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective study of glaucoma referrals across Europe: are we using resources wisely?
Founti P; Topouzis F; Holló G; Cvenkel B; Iester M; Haidich AB; Kóthy P; Kiana A; Kolokotroni D; Viswanathan AC
Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 102(3):329-337. PubMed ID: 28774936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can a community optometrist-based referral refinement scheme reduce false-positive glaucoma hospital referrals without compromising quality of care? The community and hospital allied network glaucoma evaluation scheme (CHANGES).
Bourne RR; French KA; Chang L; Borman AD; Hingorani M; Newsom WD
Eye (Lond); 2010 May; 24(5):881-7. PubMed ID: 19648892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Glaucoma detection in the community: does ongoing training of optometrists have a lasting effect?
Patel UD; Murdoch IE; Theodossiades J
Eye (Lond); 2006 May; 20(5):591-4. PubMed ID: 16021189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optometrists referrals for glaucoma assessment: a prospective survey of clinical data and outcomes.
Lockwood AJ; Kirwan JF; Ashleigh Z
Eye (Lond); 2010 Sep; 24(9):1515-9. PubMed ID: 20559331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An analysis of referral routes and diagnostic accuracy in cases of suspected glaucoma.
Sheldrick JH; Ng C; Austin DJ; Rosenthal AR
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 1994 Mar; 1(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 8790611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of referral to a glaucoma clinic.
Bell RW; O'Brien C
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jan; 17(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 9135806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Portsmouth-based glaucoma refinement scheme: a role for virtual clinics in the future?
Trikha S; Macgregor C; Jeffery M; Kirwan J
Eye (Lond); 2012 Oct; 26(10):1288-94. PubMed ID: 22766539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of referrals by community optometrists to a hospital glaucoma service.
Bowling B; Chen SD; Salmon JF
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Sep; 89(9):1102-4. PubMed ID: 16113358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of the quality of glaucoma referral letters based on a survey of glaucoma specialists and a glaucoma guideline.
Cheng J; Beltran-Agullo L; Trope GE; Buys YM
Ophthalmology; 2014 Jan; 121(1):126-133. PubMed ID: 24140116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The false negative rate and the role for virtual review in a nationally evaluated glaucoma referral refinement scheme.
Ratnarajan G; Kean J; French K; Parker M; Bourne R
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Sep; 35(5):577-81. PubMed ID: 26088949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
