These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10615440)

  • 1. Positive predictive value of optometrist-initiated referrals for glaucoma.
    Theodossiades J; Murdoch I
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 Jan; 19(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 10615440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Glaucoma case finding: a cluster-randomised intervention trial.
    Theodossiades J; Murdoch I; Cousens S
    Eye (Lond); 2004 May; 18(5):483-90. PubMed ID: 15131679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of optometrist glaucoma referrals against published guidelines.
    Khan S; Clarke J; Kotecha A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):472-7. PubMed ID: 23009293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do locally agreed guidelines for optometrists concerning the referral of glaucoma suspects influence referral practice?
    Vernon SA; Ghosh G
    Eye (Lond); 2001 Aug; 15(Pt 4):458-63. PubMed ID: 11767019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Glaucoma screening by optometrists: positive predictive value of visual field testing.
    Newman DK; Anwar S; Jordan K
    Eye (Lond); 1998; 12 ( Pt 6)():921-4. PubMed ID: 10325986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ophthalmology referrals from optometry: a comparative study (the R.O.C.S study).
    McLaughlin CR; Biehl M; Chan BJ; Mullen SJ; Zhao L; Donaldson L; Sivachandran N; Moinul P; Barbosa J; Chaudhary V
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 53(5):491-496. PubMed ID: 30340717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cambridge community Optometry Glaucoma Scheme.
    Keenan J; Shahid H; Bourne RR; White AJ; Martin KR
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 43(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 25070417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of glaucoma referral refinement criteria on referral to, and first-visit discharge rates from, the hospital eye service: the Health Innovation & Education Cluster (HIEC) Glaucoma Pathways project.
    Ratnarajan G; Newsom W; French K; Kean J; Chang L; Parker M; Garway-Heath DF; Bourne RR
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 23406492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective study on effectiveness of elevated intraocular pressure as a criterion for glaucoma referrals by optometric practitioners in Sweden.
    Landgren K; Peters D
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2021 Nov; 99(7):e1098-e1105. PubMed ID: 33423398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of referral refinement on management of glaucoma suspects in Australia.
    Huang J; Yapp M; Hennessy MP; Ly A; Masselos K; Agar A; Kalloniatis M; Zangerl B
    Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Sep; 103(5):675-683. PubMed ID: 31852027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective study of glaucoma referrals across Europe: are we using resources wisely?
    Founti P; Topouzis F; Holló G; Cvenkel B; Iester M; Haidich AB; Kóthy P; Kiana A; Kolokotroni D; Viswanathan AC
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 102(3):329-337. PubMed ID: 28774936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can a community optometrist-based referral refinement scheme reduce false-positive glaucoma hospital referrals without compromising quality of care? The community and hospital allied network glaucoma evaluation scheme (CHANGES).
    Bourne RR; French KA; Chang L; Borman AD; Hingorani M; Newsom WD
    Eye (Lond); 2010 May; 24(5):881-7. PubMed ID: 19648892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Glaucoma detection in the community: does ongoing training of optometrists have a lasting effect?
    Patel UD; Murdoch IE; Theodossiades J
    Eye (Lond); 2006 May; 20(5):591-4. PubMed ID: 16021189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optometrists referrals for glaucoma assessment: a prospective survey of clinical data and outcomes.
    Lockwood AJ; Kirwan JF; Ashleigh Z
    Eye (Lond); 2010 Sep; 24(9):1515-9. PubMed ID: 20559331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An analysis of referral routes and diagnostic accuracy in cases of suspected glaucoma.
    Sheldrick JH; Ng C; Austin DJ; Rosenthal AR
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 1994 Mar; 1(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 8790611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of referral to a glaucoma clinic.
    Bell RW; O'Brien C
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jan; 17(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 9135806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Portsmouth-based glaucoma refinement scheme: a role for virtual clinics in the future?
    Trikha S; Macgregor C; Jeffery M; Kirwan J
    Eye (Lond); 2012 Oct; 26(10):1288-94. PubMed ID: 22766539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of referrals by community optometrists to a hospital glaucoma service.
    Bowling B; Chen SD; Salmon JF
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Sep; 89(9):1102-4. PubMed ID: 16113358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the quality of glaucoma referral letters based on a survey of glaucoma specialists and a glaucoma guideline.
    Cheng J; Beltran-Agullo L; Trope GE; Buys YM
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Jan; 121(1):126-133. PubMed ID: 24140116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The false negative rate and the role for virtual review in a nationally evaluated glaucoma referral refinement scheme.
    Ratnarajan G; Kean J; French K; Parker M; Bourne R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Sep; 35(5):577-81. PubMed ID: 26088949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.