These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10616124)

  • 1. An evaluation of dipole reconstruction accuracy with spherical and realistic head models in MEG.
    Crouzeix A; Yvert B; Bertrand O; Pernier J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 110(12):2176-88. PubMed ID: 10616124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of the isolated problem approach for multi-compartment BEM models of electro-magnetic source imaging.
    Gençer NG; Akalin-Acar Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3007-22. PubMed ID: 15972977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved dipole localization using local mesh refinement of realistic head geometries: an EEG simulation study.
    Yvert B; Bertrand O; Echallier JF; Pernier J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 99(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 8758973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model.
    Fuchs M; Kastner J; Wagner M; Hawes S; Ebersole JS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 May; 113(5):702-12. PubMed ID: 11976050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of forward model errors on EEG source localization.
    Akalin Acar Z; Makeig S
    Brain Topogr; 2013 Jul; 26(3):378-96. PubMed ID: 23355112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG.
    Huang MX; Mosher JC; Leahy RM
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Feb; 44(2):423-40. PubMed ID: 10070792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom.
    Leahy RM; Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Huang MX; Lewine JD
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug; 107(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 9751287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effect of boundary element discretization on forward calculation and the inverse problem in electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography].
    Haueisen J; Böttner A; Funke M; Brauer H; Nowak H
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997 Sep; 42(9):240-8. PubMed ID: 9410154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
    Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Volume currents in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
    Van Uitert R; Weinstein D; Johnson C
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 31(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12572653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of performance of spherical and realistic head models in dipole localization from noisy EEG.
    Vanrumste B; Van Hoey G; Van de Walle R; D'Havé MR; Lemahieu IA; Boon PA
    Med Eng Phys; 2002 Jul; 24(6):403-18. PubMed ID: 12135649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of multiple-sphere head models for MEG source localization.
    Lalancette M; Quraan M; Cheyne D
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(17):5621-35. PubMed ID: 21828900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
    Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Symmetric BEM formulation for the M/EEG forward problem.
    Adde G; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Kybic J; Papadopoulo T
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():524-35. PubMed ID: 15344485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The 3D topography of MEG source localization accuracy: effects of conductor model and noise.
    Tarkiainen A; Liljeström M; Seppä M; Salmelin R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Oct; 114(10):1977-92. PubMed ID: 14499760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic evaluation of the spherical model accuracy in EEG dipole localization.
    Yvert B; Bertrand O; Thévenet M; Echallier JF; Pernier J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 May; 102(5):452-9. PubMed ID: 9191589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of volume conductor and source models to localize epileptic foci.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 24(2):101-19. PubMed ID: 17414966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
    Van Uitert R; Johnson C; Zhukov L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of three-shell and simplified volume conductor models in magnetoencephalography.
    Stenroos M; Hunold A; Haueisen J
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jul; 94():337-348. PubMed ID: 24434678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.