913 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10616242)
1. Tricuspid valve replacement: bioprostheses are preferable.
Dalrymple-Hay MJ; Leung Y; Ohri SK; Haw MP; Ross JK; Livesey SA; Monro JL
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 10616242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement: predictors of adverse outcome.
Kuwaki K; Tsukamoto M; Komatsu K; Morishita K; Sakata J; Abe T
J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 12701788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical valve replacement in congenital heart disease in children.
Lubiszewska B; Rozanski J; Szufladowicz M; Szaroszyk W; Hoffman P; Ksiezycka E; Rydlewska-Sadowska W; Ruzyllo W
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 10096487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experience with stentless aortic xenografts.
Luciani GB; Auriemma S; Casali G; Barozzi L; Lamascese N; Mazzucco A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov; 9(6):794-800. PubMed ID: 11128787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement in the current era.
Filsoufi F; Anyanwu AC; Salzberg SP; Frankel T; Cohn LH; Adams DH
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Sep; 80(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 16122441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience.
Goldsmith I; Lip GY; Mukundan S; Rosin MD
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aortic valve replacement with small-sized disc prostheses (medtronic hall).
Brazao AJ; Prieto D; de Oliveira JF; Eugenio L; Antunes MJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):680-6. PubMed ID: 10616248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tricuspid valve replacement: clinical long-term results for acquired isolated tricuspid valve regurgitation.
Maleszka A; Kleikamp G; Koerfer R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):957-61. PubMed ID: 15597590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short-term results of repeat valve replacement: a predictive factor analysis.
Beurtheret S; Gariboldi V; Feier H; Grisoli D; Riberi A; Mouly-Bandini A; Métras D; Kerbaul F; Collart F
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 May; 19(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 20583395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical outcome after isolated tricuspid valve replacement: 20-year experience.
Do QB; Pellerin M; Carrier M; Cartier R; Hébert Y; Pagé P; Perrault LP; Pelletier LC
Can J Cardiol; 2000 Apr; 16(4):489-93. PubMed ID: 10787464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiple valve replacement increases the risk of reoperation for structural degeneration of bioprostheses.
Caus T; Albertini JN; Chi Y; Collart F; Monties JR; Mesana T
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jul; 8(4):376-83. PubMed ID: 10461236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk of reoperation for mitral bioprosthesis dysfunction.
Jaussaud N; Gariboldi V; Grisoli D; Berbis J; Kerbaul F; Riberi A; Collart F
J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Jan; 21(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 22474743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CarboMedics mechanical prosthesis: performance at eight years.
Jamieson WR; Fradet GJ; Miyagishima RT; Henderson C; Brownlee RT; Zhang J; Germann E
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Sep; 9(5):678-87. PubMed ID: 11041184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The homograft aortic valve: a 29-year, 99.3% follow up of 1,022 valve replacements.
O'Brien MF; Harrocks S; Stafford EG; Gardner MA; Pohlner PG; Tesar PJ; Stephens F
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):334-44; discussion 335. PubMed ID: 11380096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population.
Bottio T; Rizzoli G; Caprili L; Testolin L; Thiene G; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses.
Brown ML; Schaff HV; Lahr BD; Mullany CJ; Sundt TM; Dearani JA; McGregor CG; Orszulak TA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 135(4):878-84; discussion 884. PubMed ID: 18374773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mid-term clinical and echocardiographic follow up of patients with CarboMedics valves in the tricuspid position.
Shapira Y; Nili M; Hirsch R; Vaturi M; Vidne B; Sagie A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 10888097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Isolated tricuspid valve replacement. Long-term results].
Do QB; Pellerin M; Carrier M; Cartier R; Hébert Y; Pagé P; Perrault LP; Pelletier LC
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2000 Sep; 93(9):1119-24. PubMed ID: 11055003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis: assessment of a patient selection policy.
Louagie Y; Noirhomme P; Aranguis E; Eucher P; Vanruyssevelt P; Buche M; Dion R; Jaumin P; Schoevaerdts JC; Chalant CH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Oct; 104(4):1013-24. PubMed ID: 1405658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: time-related outcomes and risk factors.
Alsoufi B; Al-Halees Z; Fadel B; Al-Wesabi A; Al-Ahmadi M; Joufan M; Siblini G; Canver CC
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 May; 19(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 20583397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
