185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10616885)
21. Human-observer receiver-operating-characteristic evaluation of attenuation, scatter, and resolution compensation strategies for (99m)Tc myocardial perfusion imaging.
Narayanan MV; King MA; Pretorius PH; Dahlberg ST; Spencer F; Simon E; Ewald E; Healy E; MacNaught K; Leppo JA
J Nucl Med; 2003 Nov; 44(11):1725-34. PubMed ID: 14602852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Qualitative and quantitative comparison between images obtained with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction in prostate cancer lesions of (18)F-FDG PET.
Etchebehere EC; Macapinlac HA; Gonen M; Humm K; Yeung HW; Akhurst T; Scher HI; Larson SM
Q J Nucl Med; 2002 Jun; 46(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 12114875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling.
Boellaard R; van Lingen A; Lammertsma AA
J Nucl Med; 2001 May; 42(5):808-17. PubMed ID: 11337581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Correction of photon attenuation and collimator response for a body-contouring SPECT/CT imaging system.
Seo Y; Wong KH; Sun M; Franc BL; Hawkins RA; Hasegawa BH
J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):868-77. PubMed ID: 15872362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Quantitative evaluation of 2-deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose uptake in hepatic metastases with combined PET-CT: iterative reconstruction with CT attenuation correction versus filtered back projection with 68Germanium attenuation correction.
Chin BB; Patel PV; Nakamoto Y; Cohade C; Osman M; Marshall LT; Wahl RL
Mol Imaging Biol; 2002 Nov; 4(6):399-409. PubMed ID: 14537104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lesion-to-background ratio in nonattenuation-corrected whole-body FDG PET images.
Imran MB; Kubota K; Yamada S; Fukuda H; Yamada K; Fujiwara T; Itoh M
J Nucl Med; 1998 Jul; 39(7):1219-23. PubMed ID: 9669398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of filtering on the detection and localization of small Ga-67 lesions in thoracic single photon emission computed tomography images.
Wells RG; Simkin PH; Judy PF; King MA; Pretorius H; Gifford HC
Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1382-8. PubMed ID: 10435542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact on reader performance for lesion-detection/ localization tasks of anatomical priors in SPECT reconstruction.
Lehovich A; Bruyant PP; Gifford HS; Schneider PB; Squires S; Licho R; Gindi G; King MA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Sep; 28(9):1459-67. PubMed ID: 19336295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quantitative comparison of analytic and iterative reconstruction methods in 2- and 3-dimensional dynamic cardiac 18F-FDG PET.
Lubberink M; Boellaard R; van der Weerdt AP; Visser FC; Lammertsma AA
J Nucl Med; 2004 Dec; 45(12):2008-15. PubMed ID: 15585474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Optimization of PET image quality by means of 3D data acquisition and iterative image reconstruction].
Doll J; Zaers J; Trojan H; Bellemann ME; Adam LE; Haberkorn U; Brix G
Nuklearmedizin; 1998 Mar; 37(2):62-7. PubMed ID: 9547752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. LROC analysis of detector-response compensation in SPECT.
Gifford HC; King MA; Wells RG; Hawkins WG; Narayanan MV; Pretorius PH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 May; 19(5):463-73. PubMed ID: 11021689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of scatter compensation strategies for (67)Ga SPECT using numerical observers and human LROC studies.
Farncombe TH; Gifford HC; Narayanan MV; Pretorius PH; Frey EC; King MA
J Nucl Med; 2004 May; 45(5):802-12. PubMed ID: 15136630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. NEMA NU4-2008 image quality performance report for the microPET focus 120 and for various transmission and reconstruction methods.
Bahri MA; Plenevaux A; Warnock G; Luxen A; Seret A
J Nucl Med; 2009 Oct; 50(10):1730-8. PubMed ID: 19759103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of OSEM and segmented attenuation correction in the calculation of standardised uptake values for [18F]FDG PET.
Visvikis D; Cheze-LeRest C; Costa DC; Bomanji J; Gacinovic S; Ell PJ
Eur J Nucl Med; 2001 Sep; 28(9):1326-35. PubMed ID: 11585291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for ultralow-dose computed tomography of the lung: a pilot study.
Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Tanami Y; Shiomi E; Sugiura H; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
Invest Radiol; 2012 Aug; 47(8):482-9. PubMed ID: 22766910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of varying number of OSEM subsets on PET lesion detectability.
Morey AM; Kadrmas DJ
J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Dec; 41(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 24221921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. FDG PET and dual-head gamma camera positron coincidence detection imaging of suspected malignancies and brain disorders.
Delbeke D; Patton JA; Martin WH; Sandler MP
J Nucl Med; 1999 Jan; 40(1):110-7. PubMed ID: 9935066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Non-small cell lung cancer: whole-body MR examination for M-stage assessment--utility for whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging compared with integrated FDG PET/CT.
Ohno Y; Koyama H; Onishi Y; Takenaka D; Nogami M; Yoshikawa T; Matsumoto S; Kotani Y; Sugimura K
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):643-54. PubMed ID: 18539889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. ROC analysis for assessment of lesion detection performance in 3D PET: influence of reconstruction algorithms.
Glatting G; Werner C; Reske SN; Bellemann ME
Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2315-9. PubMed ID: 14528952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Voxel-based comparison of state-of-the-art reconstruction algorithms for 18F-FDG PET brain imaging using simulated and clinical data.
Vunckx K; Dupont P; Goffin K; Van Paesschen W; Van Laere K; Nuyts J
Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 102 Pt 2():875-84. PubMed ID: 25008958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
