239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10617182)
1. Roche's Taq patent 'obtained by deceit', rules US court.
Dalton R
Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6763):709. PubMed ID: 10617182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Promega files court challenge to Roche's Taq enzyme patent.
Dickson D
Nature; 1994 Dec 22-29; 372(6508):714. PubMed ID: 7997253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Why Roche deserves the disputed Taq patent.
White TJ
Nature; 2000 Feb; 403(6772):825-6. PubMed ID: 10706256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Roche faces charges over Taq patent claim.
Abbott A
Nature; 1996 Aug; 382(6593):660. PubMed ID: 8751427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. PCR. Roche dealt a setback on European Taq patent.
Service RF
Science; 2001 Jun; 292(5523):1815. PubMed ID: 11397920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. New rulings on the Cetus patent for taq polymerase.
Leonard DG; Schifreen RS; Sninsky JJ; White TJ
Mol Diagn; 2000 Mar; 5(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 10837081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Intellectual property. Court tightens patent rules on gene tags.
Kintisch E
Science; 2005 Sep; 309(5742):1797-9. PubMed ID: 16166482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Patent ruling could cut PCR enzyme prices.
Dalton R
Nature; 2001 Jun; 411(6838):622. PubMed ID: 11395726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patents. Signature on visitor's form fuels Stanford v. Roche court battle.
Marshall E
Science; 2011 Apr; 332(6026):163. PubMed ID: 21474725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Sparks continue to fly in Taq patent dispute.
Dickson D
Nature; 1995 Feb; 373(6513):377. PubMed ID: 7830782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. US court tests the breadth of patent protection on proteins.
Wadman M
Nature; 2000 Apr; 404(6778):532. PubMed ID: 10766203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. US court bolsters biotech patent protection.
Harrison C
Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Aug; 29(8):672-3. PubMed ID: 21822224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Insulin patent dispute revisits old biotechnology battleground.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Apr; 15(4):307. PubMed ID: 9094114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. US Supreme Court applies strict limits to patents.
Robertson D
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jul; 20(7):639. PubMed ID: 12089532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Court leaves patent issue unclear.
Marshall E
Science; 1991 Oct; 254(5030):368. PubMed ID: 1925589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Have you bargained away patent rights? Inventors and entrepreneurs need to consider a recent Supreme Court ruling in their patent strategies.
Baggot B
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Mar; 17(3):297-8. PubMed ID: 10096300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. US Supreme Court decision could compromise biotech patents.
Robertson D
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 May; 19(5):394. PubMed ID: 11328981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Supreme Court boosts licensees in biotech patent battles.
Waltz E
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Mar; 25(3):264-5. PubMed ID: 17344866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cetus battles with Du Pont.
Gershon D
Nature; 1990 Jan; 343(6256):301. PubMed ID: 2300180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Patenting DNA: just when you thought it was safe.
Chahine KG
Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Jun; 15(6):586-8. PubMed ID: 9181584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
