These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10617782)

  • 1. Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language.
    Bertram R; Laine M; Harald Baayen R; Schreuder R; Hyönä J
    Cognition; 2000 Feb; 74(2):B13-25. PubMed ID: 10617782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: the role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity.
    Bertram R; Schreuder R; Baayen RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Mar; 26(2):489-511. PubMed ID: 10764108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recognition of inflected words in a morphologically limited language: frequency effects in monolinguals and bilinguals.
    Lehtonen M; Niska H; Wande E; Niemi J; Laine M
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2006 Mar; 35(2):121-46. PubMed ID: 16538549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Whole-word frequency and inflectional paradigm size facilitate Estonian case-inflected noun processing.
    Lõo K; Järvikivi J; Baayen RH
    Cognition; 2018 Jun; 175():20-25. PubMed ID: 29455031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The neural bases of the learning and generalization of morphological inflection.
    Nevat M; Ullman MT; Eviatar Z; Bitan T
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Apr; 98():139-155. PubMed ID: 27575853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neurocognitive processing of auditorily and visually presented inflected words and pseudowords: evidence from a morphologically rich language.
    Leinonen A; Grönholm-Nyman P; Järvenpää M; Söderholm C; Lappi O; Laine M; Krause CM
    Brain Res; 2009 Jun; 1275():54-66. PubMed ID: 19362541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural dynamics of reading morphologically complex words.
    Vartiainen J; Aggujaro S; Lehtonen M; Hultén A; Laine M; Salmelin R
    Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 47(4):2064-72. PubMed ID: 19520173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognition of morphologically complex words in Finnish: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Lehtonen M; Cunillera T; Rodríguez-Fornells A; Hultén A; Tuomainen J; Laine M
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1148():123-37. PubMed ID: 17382308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The processing of inflected words.
    Katz L; Rexer K; Lukatela G
    Psychol Res; 1991; 53(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 1857756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Counterintuitive cross-linguistic differences: More morphological computation in English than in Finnish.
    Vannest J; Bertram R; Järvikivi J; Niemi J
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2002 Mar; 31(2):83-106. PubMed ID: 12022795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural correlates of morphological decomposition in a morphologically rich language: an fMRI study.
    Lehtonen M; Vorobyev VA; Hugdahl K; Tuokkola T; Laine M
    Brain Lang; 2006 Aug; 98(2):182-93. PubMed ID: 16725189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural dynamics of inflectional and derivational morphology processing in the human brain.
    Leminen A; Leminen M; Kujala T; Shtyrov Y
    Cortex; 2013; 49(10):2758-71. PubMed ID: 24075689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential recall of derived and inflected word forms in working memory: examining the role of morphological information in simple and complex working memory tasks.
    Service E; Maury S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():1064. PubMed ID: 25642181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Morphological errors and the representation of morphology in the lexical-semantic system.
    Miceli G
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1994 Oct; 346(1315):79-87. PubMed ID: 7886157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in word recognition between early bilinguals and monolinguals: behavioral and ERP evidence.
    Lehtonen M; Hultén A; Rodríguez-Fornells A; Cunillera T; Tuomainen J; Laine M
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1362-71. PubMed ID: 22387606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Processing of English inflectional morphology.
    Sereno JA; Jongman A
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Jul; 25(4):425-37. PubMed ID: 9259621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lexical access to inflected words as measured by lateralized visual lexical decision.
    Laine M; Koivisto M
    Psychol Res; 1998; 61(3):220-9. PubMed ID: 9747599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. L1 effects on the processing of inflected nouns in L2.
    Portin M; Lehtonen M; Harrer G; Wande E; Niemi J; Laine M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jul; 128(3):452-65. PubMed ID: 17719552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Morphological family size in a morphologically rich language: the case of Finnish compared with Dutch and Hebrew.
    Moscoso del Prado Martín F; Bertram R; Häikiö T; Schreuder R; Baayen RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Nov; 30(6):1271-8. PubMed ID: 15521803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recall of morphologically complex forms is affected by memory task but not dyslexia.
    Service E; Tujulin AM
    Brain Lang; 2002; 81(1-3):42-54. PubMed ID: 12081380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.