These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10618179)

  • 1. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity utilizing a battery of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity tests.
    Kim BS; Margolin BH
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 34(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 10618179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.
    Kirkland D; Reeve L; Gatehouse D; Vanparys P
    Mutat Res; 2011 Mar; 721(1):27-73. PubMed ID: 21238603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of rodent carcinogens and noncarcinogens using genetic toxicity tests: premises, promises, and performance.
    Zeiger E
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Oct; 28(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 9927558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-term tests for defining mutagenic carcinogens.
    Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):499-536. PubMed ID: 10353401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens III. Appropriate follow-up testing in vivo.
    Kirkland D; Speit G
    Mutat Res; 2008 Jul; 654(2):114-32. PubMed ID: 18585956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes.
    Kirkland DJ; Henderson L; Marzin D; Müller L; Parry JM; Speit G; Tweats DJ; Williams GM
    Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):88-105. PubMed ID: 16326131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An analysis of genetic toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity data: I. Identification of carcinogens using surrogate endpoints.
    Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Cimino MC; Benz RD; Contrera JF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 16386343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mouse bone marrow micronucleus assay: relationships with in vitro mutagenicity and rodent carcinogenicity.
    Benigni R
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1995 Jul; 45(3):337-47. PubMed ID: 7609006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The comet assay with multiple mouse organs: comparison of comet assay results and carcinogenicity with 208 chemicals selected from the IARC monographs and U.S. NTP Carcinogenicity Database.
    Sasaki YF; Sekihashi K; Izumiyama F; Nishidate E; Saga A; Ishida K; Tsuda S
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2000 Nov; 30(6):629-799. PubMed ID: 11145306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting rodent carcinogenicity using potency measures of the in vitro sister chromatid exchange and chromosome aberration assays.
    Schildcrout JS; Margolin BH; Zeiger E
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 33(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 10037324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-aided rodent carcinogenicity prediction.
    Lagunin AA; Dearden JC; Filimonov DA; Poroikov VV
    Mutat Res; 2005 Oct; 586(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 16112600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the Salmonella umu test with 83 NTP chemicals.
    Yasunaga K; Kiyonari A; Oikawa T; Abe N; Yoshikawa K
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2004; 44(4):329-45. PubMed ID: 15476194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The challenge of testing chemicals for potential carcinogenicity using multiple short-term assays: an analysis of a proposed test battery for hair dyes.
    Rosenkranz HS; Cunningham SL; Mermelstein R; Cunningham AR
    Mutat Res; 2007 Sep; 633(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 17625954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The genotoxicity and carcinogenic potential of gastrofenzin].
    Mirkova E
    Eksp Med Morfol; 1994; 32(3-4):57-68. PubMed ID: 8857033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity assays: their use and interpretation.
    McGregor D
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 340B():159-69. PubMed ID: 2203003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of published data for top concentration considerations in mammalian cell genotoxicity testing.
    Parry JM; Parry E; Phrakonkham P; Corvi R
    Mutagenesis; 2010 Nov; 25(6):531-8. PubMed ID: 20720196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The micronucleus test and NTP rodent carcinogens: not so many false negatives.
    Galloway SM
    Mutat Res; 1996 Jun; 352(1-2):185-8. PubMed ID: 8676909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of in vivo erythrocyte micronucleus and transgenic rodent gene mutation tests to detect rodent carcinogens.
    Morita T; Hamada S; Masumura K; Wakata A; Maniwa J; Takasawa H; Yasunaga K; Hashizume T; Honma M
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2016 May; 802():1-29. PubMed ID: 27169373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.