170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10618799)
1. [Biases in meta-analysis].
Delgado-Rodríguez M; Sillero-Arenas M
Med Clin (Barc); 1999; 112 Suppl 1():43-50. PubMed ID: 10618799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
Formann AK
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.
Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M
Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry.
Biljana M; Jelena M; Branislav J; Milorad R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():323-8. PubMed ID: 10724898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analysis under the spotlight: focused on a meta-analysis of ventilator weaning.
Tobin MJ; Jubran A
Crit Care Med; 2008 Jan; 36(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 18007269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L
Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.
Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):894-901. PubMed ID: 16085192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
Finckh A; Tramèr MR
Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis.
Schwarzer G; Carpenter J; Rücker G
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 19836925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimates of the average strength of natural selection are not inflated by sampling error or publication bias.
Knapczyk FN; Conner JK
Am Nat; 2007 Oct; 170(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 17891729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.
Westhoff CL
Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):5-6, 8. PubMed ID: 12288680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using journal impact factors to correct for the publication bias of medical studies.
Baker R; Jackson D
Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):785-92. PubMed ID: 16984321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power.
Borm GF; den Heijer M; Zielhuis GA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):47.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18620841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis in evidence-based orthodontics.
Papadopoulos MA
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2003 May; 6(2):112-26. PubMed ID: 12809274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meta-analysis.
Rosenfeld RM
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2004; 66(4):186-95. PubMed ID: 15467343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conflicts of interest in medical science: peer usage, peer review and 'CoI consultancy'.
Charlton BG
Med Hypotheses; 2004; 63(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15236772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analysis in medical research: potentials and limitations.
Zwahlen M; Renehan A; Egger M
Urol Oncol; 2008; 26(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 18452828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inflation of type I error rate in two statistical tests for the detection of publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2465-77. PubMed ID: 12205693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selection bias in meta-analyses of gene-disease associations.
Tang JL
PLoS Med; 2005 Dec; 2(12):e409. PubMed ID: 16363911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
