These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10619053)

  • 1. Evaluation of regression calibration and SIMEX methods in logistic regression when one of the predictors is subject to additive measurement error.
    Fung KY; Krewski D
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 1999; 4(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 10619053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adjusting for measurement error in the Cox proportional hazards regression model.
    Mallick R; Fung K; Krewski D
    J Cancer Epidemiol Prev; 2002; 7(4):155-64. PubMed ID: 12846486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regression calibration for classical exposure measurement error in environmental epidemiology studies using multiple local surrogate exposures.
    Bateson TF; Wright JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 172(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 20573838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simulation-based comparison of techniques to correct for measurement error in matched case-control studies.
    Guolo A; Brazzale AR
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3755-75. PubMed ID: 18407572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry.
    Warton DI; Wright IJ; Falster DS; Westoby M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2006 May; 81(2):259-91. PubMed ID: 16573844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of misclassified correlated binary data using a multivariate probit model when covariates are subject to measurement error.
    Roy S; Banerjee T
    Biom J; 2009 Jun; 51(3):420-32. PubMed ID: 19588453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement.
    Chatburn RL
    AANA J; 1996 Jun; 64(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 9095698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variance and confidence limits in validation studies based on comparison between three different types of measurements.
    Ferrari P; Kaaks R; Riboli E
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(5):303-13. PubMed ID: 11142606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlated measurement error--implications for nutritional epidemiology.
    Day NE; Wong MY; Bingham S; Khaw KT; Luben R; Michels KB; Welch A; Wareham NJ
    Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 33(6):1373-81. PubMed ID: 15333617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The number needed to treat (NNT) can be adjusted for bias when the outcome is measured with error.
    Marschner IC; Emberson J; Irwig L; Walter SD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1244-52. PubMed ID: 15617950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linear mixed models for replication data to efficiently allow for covariate measurement error.
    Bartlett JW; De Stavola BL; Frost C
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(25):3158-78. PubMed ID: 19777493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the potential of measurement error to induce differential bias on odds ratio estimates: an example from radon epidemiology.
    Heid IM; Küchenhoff H; Wellmann J; Gerken M; Kreienbrock L; Wichmann HE
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3261-78. PubMed ID: 12375303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple-imputation for measurement-error correction.
    Cole SR; Chu H; Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 35(4):1074-81. PubMed ID: 16709616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shared uncertainty in measurement error problems, with application to Nevada Test Site fallout data.
    Li Y; Guolo A; Hoffman FO; Carroll RJ
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1226-36. PubMed ID: 18078484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fully parametric and semi-parametric regression models for common events with covariate measurement error in main study/validation study designs.
    Spiegelman D; Casella M
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):395-409. PubMed ID: 9192443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating and testing interactions in linear regression models when explanatory variables are subject to classical measurement error.
    Murad H; Freedman LS
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4293-310. PubMed ID: 17340676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new method for dealing with measurement error in explanatory variables of regression models.
    Freedman LS; Fainberg V; Kipnis V; Midthune D; Carroll RJ
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):172-81. PubMed ID: 15032787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hypothesis testing in an errors-in-variables model with heteroscedastic measurement errors.
    de Castro M; Galea M; Bolfarine H
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(25):5217-34. PubMed ID: 18561290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining the presence of bias error using statistical methods.
    Kwartowitz DM; Galloway RL; Shiavi RG
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 Jan; 13(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 19129017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression.
    Vittinghoff E; McCulloch CE
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 165(6):710-8. PubMed ID: 17182981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.