These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10621106)

  • 1. Member grievances in Medicare+Choice programs: a review of Grijalva v. Shalala.
    Levin L
    Manag Care Interface; 1999 Sep; 12(9):78-81. PubMed ID: 10621106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Another view of Medicare HMOs: not always what the doctor ordered. Interview by Meg Matheny.
    Wilson SA
    Health Syst Lead; 1995 Jun; 2(5):11-3. PubMed ID: 10142990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Arizona suit lights fire; HCFA plans revision of grievance and appeals. Grijalva v. Shalala.
    Public Sect Contract Rep; 1997 Feb; 3(2):28-30. PubMed ID: 10184806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medicare managed care: a new constitutional right to due process for denials of care under Grijalva v. Shalala.
    Gegwich CG
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2000 Nov; (259):9-48. PubMed ID: 11186858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medicaid & Medicare: HCFA must monitor HMOs to ensure appeal rights for Medicare beneficiaries.
    Alderman J
    J Law Med Ethics; 1998; 26(3):253-4. PubMed ID: 11066888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patients' rights in managed care--exit, voice, and choice.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Jul; 337(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 9219710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medicare program; improvement to the Medicare+Choice appeal and grievance procedures. Final rule with comment period.
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2003 Apr; 68(65):16651-69. PubMed ID: 12678046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medicare program; establishment of an expedited review process for Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in health maintenance organizations, competitive medical plans, and health care prepayment plans--HCFA. Final rule with comment period.
    Fed Regist; 1997 Apr; 62(83):23368-76. PubMed ID: 10167525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prepare for scrutiny of your role in Medicare appeals.
    Public Sect Contract Rep; 1999 May; 5(5):65-72. PubMed ID: 10538099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medicare providers, plans may suffer regulation overkill.
    Public Sect Contract Rep; 1998 Oct; 4(10):145-9. PubMed ID: 10187166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Supreme Court's pre-emptive strike against patients' rights to sue their HMOs.
    Kopels S; Manselle T
    Soc Work Health Care; 2006; 43(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 16723332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality, the consumer, and the Patient's Bill of Rights movement.
    Robinson JL; Nash DB
    Manag Care Interface; 2000 Oct; 13(10):69, 76. PubMed ID: 11155647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medicare program; appeal rights and procedures for beneficiaries enrolled in prepaid health care plans--HCFA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1994 Nov; 59(223):59933-43. PubMed ID: 10138801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perspectives. Are unrealistic expectations confusing policy debate on Medicare HMOs?
    Cunningham R
    Med Health; 1999 Sep; 53(38):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10621132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Supreme court upholds state independent review laws: does this help or hinder health plans?
    Bloom A
    Manag Care Interface; 2002 Sep; 15(9):56-7, 61. PubMed ID: 12244651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Patient's Bill of Rights: is the cure worse than the disease?
    Bowlus B
    Manag Care Interface; 2000 Oct; 13(10):71-2. PubMed ID: 11155649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perspectives. Bilirakis proposal would channel drug aid through state programs, Medicare HMOs.
    Cunningham R
    Med Health; 1999 Oct; 53(40):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10621135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. U.S. Supreme Court validates HMO financial incentives and further undermines professionalism in the practice of medicine.
    Gale AH
    Mo Med; 2000 Oct; 97(10):475-6. PubMed ID: 11043028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A court muddies the water for HMO liability.
    Guglielmo WJ
    Med Econ; 1999 Jan; 76(1):41. PubMed ID: 10351080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Law & psychiatry: Pegram v. Herdrich: the Supreme Court passes the buck on managed care.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2000 Oct; 51(10):1225-6, 1238. PubMed ID: 11013317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.