472 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10621280)
1. What JCAHO says it's doing to address OIG's concerns.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Oct; 24(10):151. PubMed ID: 10621280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. OIG report spurs JCAHO changes in accreditation surveys, oversight.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Sep; 24(9):133-5. PubMed ID: 10558178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. JCAHO, HCFA surveys inconsistent--GAO.
Tokarski C
Mod Healthc; 1990 Jun; 20(24):2. PubMed ID: 10105082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Inspecting the inspectors: feds target JCAHO.
Hosp Case Manag; 1997 Aug; 5(8):149-51. PubMed ID: 10169513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measures help surveyors compare hospitals.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 Mar; 29(3):32-3. PubMed ID: 15015431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A primer on JCAHO performance data.
Data Strateg Benchmarks; 2002 Mar; 6(3):37-9. PubMed ID: 11951364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Report: JCAHO survey process fails public.
Moore JD
Mod Healthc; 1999 Jul; 29(30):2-3, 12. PubMed ID: 10539342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. JCAHO unveils major changes to survey process.
Hosp Case Manag; 2002 Dec; 10(12):190-2. PubMed ID: 12489390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. JCAHO report assesses hospitals standards compliance.
Koska MT
Trustee; 1991 Feb; 44(2):14. PubMed ID: 10109061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. O'Leary's legacy. Exiting JCAHO president revamped surveys.
Robeznieks A
Mod Healthc; 2006 Jun; 36(23):8-9. PubMed ID: 16792228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Hospitals getting more RFIs in 2006: what problems are surveyors finding?
Hosp Case Manag; 2006 Aug; 14(8):119-21. PubMed ID: 16872055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Increasing the pressure. AHA seeks HHS advisory on JCAHO data mining.
Conn J
Mod Healthc; 2005 Nov; 35(45):8-9. PubMed ID: 16299979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A commission out of joint. Another report adds to evidence that JCAHO needs a total overhaul.
Sloan T
Mod Healthc; 2004 Aug; 34(31):20. PubMed ID: 15332522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving scoring consistency with the scan process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jul; 24(7):1, 3. PubMed ID: 15328761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. ORYX data to play key role in new JCAHO survey process.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2003 Jan; 28(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12561296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. JCAHO: safety, medical staff issues hinder compliance.
Koska MT
Hospitals; 1992 Apr; 66(7):46-8. PubMed ID: 1547998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Implementing the priority focus process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Oct; 22(10):8-9. PubMed ID: 12387209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Changing the rules. With hospitals increasingly dissatisfied with the accreditation process and its high costs, the JCAHO overhauls its approach.
Morrissey J
Mod Healthc; 2002 Oct; 32(40):8-9, 16, 3. PubMed ID: 12389315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A welcome delay. Small hospitals applaud JCAHO Oryx extension.
Moore JD
Mod Healthc; 1998 Jan; 28(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 10175894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Inspector General and JCAHO.
Billingsley M
Nursingconnections; 1999; 12(3):59-61. PubMed ID: 10788905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
