These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10621280)

  • 1. What JCAHO says it's doing to address OIG's concerns.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Oct; 24(10):151. PubMed ID: 10621280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. OIG report spurs JCAHO changes in accreditation surveys, oversight.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Sep; 24(9):133-5. PubMed ID: 10558178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. JCAHO, HCFA surveys inconsistent--GAO.
    Tokarski C
    Mod Healthc; 1990 Jun; 20(24):2. PubMed ID: 10105082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inspecting the inspectors: feds target JCAHO.
    Hosp Case Manag; 1997 Aug; 5(8):149-51. PubMed ID: 10169513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measures help surveyors compare hospitals.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 Mar; 29(3):32-3. PubMed ID: 15015431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A primer on JCAHO performance data.
    Data Strateg Benchmarks; 2002 Mar; 6(3):37-9. PubMed ID: 11951364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Report: JCAHO survey process fails public.
    Moore JD
    Mod Healthc; 1999 Jul; 29(30):2-3, 12. PubMed ID: 10539342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. JCAHO unveils major changes to survey process.
    Hosp Case Manag; 2002 Dec; 10(12):190-2. PubMed ID: 12489390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. JCAHO report assesses hospitals standards compliance.
    Koska MT
    Trustee; 1991 Feb; 44(2):14. PubMed ID: 10109061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. O'Leary's legacy. Exiting JCAHO president revamped surveys.
    Robeznieks A
    Mod Healthc; 2006 Jun; 36(23):8-9. PubMed ID: 16792228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hospitals getting more RFIs in 2006: what problems are surveyors finding?
    Hosp Case Manag; 2006 Aug; 14(8):119-21. PubMed ID: 16872055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increasing the pressure. AHA seeks HHS advisory on JCAHO data mining.
    Conn J
    Mod Healthc; 2005 Nov; 35(45):8-9. PubMed ID: 16299979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A commission out of joint. Another report adds to evidence that JCAHO needs a total overhaul.
    Sloan T
    Mod Healthc; 2004 Aug; 34(31):20. PubMed ID: 15332522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving scoring consistency with the scan process.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jul; 24(7):1, 3. PubMed ID: 15328761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ORYX data to play key role in new JCAHO survey process.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2003 Jan; 28(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12561296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. JCAHO: safety, medical staff issues hinder compliance.
    Koska MT
    Hospitals; 1992 Apr; 66(7):46-8. PubMed ID: 1547998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementing the priority focus process.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Oct; 22(10):8-9. PubMed ID: 12387209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changing the rules. With hospitals increasingly dissatisfied with the accreditation process and its high costs, the JCAHO overhauls its approach.
    Morrissey J
    Mod Healthc; 2002 Oct; 32(40):8-9, 16, 3. PubMed ID: 12389315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A welcome delay. Small hospitals applaud JCAHO Oryx extension.
    Moore JD
    Mod Healthc; 1998 Jan; 28(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 10175894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Inspector General and JCAHO.
    Billingsley M
    Nursingconnections; 1999; 12(3):59-61. PubMed ID: 10788905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.