These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10621281)

  • 1. New ruling in NC affirms peer review privacy.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Oct; 24(10):153-4. PubMed ID: 10621281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review puzzle. Supreme Court sidesteps appeal to keep records closed.
    Blesch G
    Mod Healthc; 2008 Jan; 38(2):17. PubMed ID: 18260535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hospital peer review is a kangaroo court.
    Townend DW
    Med Econ; 2000 Feb; 77(3):133-6, 141. PubMed ID: 10848200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Special report: new paradigms in credentialing. Peer review process called into question.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Aug; 24(8):123-6. PubMed ID: 10621289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Divulging hospital records: need for access vs. confidentiality.
    Bernstein AH
    Hospitals; 1979 Apr; 53(7):51, 54, 58. PubMed ID: 761887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Promoting better health care: policy arguments for concurrent quality assurance and attorney-client hospital incident report privileges.
    Dollar CJ
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1993; 3(1):259-308. PubMed ID: 10138438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Legal review: a case study from California--the sharing of peer review information between hospitals and nonhospital providers.
    Brown LC
    Top Health Inf Manage; 1994 May; 14(4):68-73. PubMed ID: 10134763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review: confidentiality and privilege.
    Devlin MM
    J Med Pract Manage; 2000; 16(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 11280209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer-review showdown. High court review could lead to opening records.
    Blesch G
    Mod Healthc; 2007 Dec; 37(48):10. PubMed ID: 18203353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review: confidentiality and privilege--Part Two.
    Devlin MM
    J Med Pract Manage; 2001; 16(5):261-3. PubMed ID: 11345885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidentiary privilege for peer review documents rejected by the Fourth Circuit. Virmani v. Novant Health Inc.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2002 May; 19(7):6-8. PubMed ID: 11989437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medical staff records exempt from discovery.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1982 Apr; 63(4):72-3. PubMed ID: 10254841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. State medical peer review: high cost but no benefit--is it time for a change?
    Scheutzow SO
    Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(1):7-60. PubMed ID: 10207570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Courts beginning to address confidentiality of physicians' credentialing records.
    Dawson JS
    Healthspan; 1994 Jun; 11(6):3-5. PubMed ID: 10135152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Important hospital confidentiality interests are strengthened through Illinois court's denial of staff privileges material discovery in malpractice action.
    O'Brien JP
    Health Law Vigil; 1982 Feb; 5(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 10254162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developments in peer review.
    Kinderman K
    J Med Pract Manage; 2002; 17(5):251-3. PubMed ID: 12058695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protecting the confidentiality of peer review information.
    McCann RW
    J AHIMA; 1993 Dec; 64(12):52-6; quiz 57-8. PubMed ID: 10130489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health Care Quality Improvement Act and NPDB: where are we now?
    Brennan ED
    QRC Advis; 1999 Nov; 16(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10622805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New Jersey appellate court rules on hospital's internal procedures. Ende v. Cohen.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1998 Jan; 15(3):5-8. PubMed ID: 10176087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review potpourri: new developments in credentialing and privileging. Panel discussion.
    Kadzielski MA; Meinhardt RA; McCabe TA
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1995 Apr; (194):9-31. PubMed ID: 10144588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.