These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10622695)
41. Decision makers' views on health care objectives and budget constraints: results from a pilot study. Al MJ; Feenstra T; Brouwer WB Health Policy; 2004 Oct; 70(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 15312708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Program budgeting and marginal analysis: a priority-setting framework for Canadian Regional Health Authorities. Mitton C; Donaldson C; Dean S; West B Healthc Manage Forum; 2000; 13(4):24-31. PubMed ID: 11214982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Linking measures of health gain to explicit priority setting by an area health service in Australia. Cromwell DA; Viney R; Halsall J; Hindle D Soc Sci Med; 1998 Dec; 47(12):2067-74. PubMed ID: 10075247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Involving the public in priority setting: a case study using discrete choice experiments. Watson V; Carnon A; Ryan M; Cox D J Public Health (Oxf); 2012 Jun; 34(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 22173912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Optimizing a portfolio of health care programs in the presence of uncertainty and constrained resources. Sendi P; Al MJ; Gafni A; Birch S Soc Sci Med; 2003 Dec; 57(11):2207-15. PubMed ID: 14512250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Clearing the fog on the Tyne: programme budgeting in Newcastle and North Tyneside Health Authority. Craig N; Parkin D; Gerard K Health Policy; 1995 Aug; 33(2):107-25. PubMed ID: 10144435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Decentralized health care priority-setting in Tanzania: evaluating against the accountability for reasonableness framework. Maluka S; Kamuzora P; San Sebastiån M; Byskov J; Olsen ØE; Shayo E; Ndawi B; Hurtig AK Soc Sci Med; 2010 Aug; 71(4):751-9. PubMed ID: 20554365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Leadership and priority setting: the perspective of hospital CEOs. Reeleder D; Goel V; Singer PA; Martin DK Health Policy; 2006 Nov; 79(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 16377023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Resource allocation in orthopaedics: economic evaluation to priority setting. Bate A; Donaldson C; Ray H Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Apr; 457():49-56. PubMed ID: 17290157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Priority setting in practice: participants opinions on vertical and horizontal priority setting for reallocation. Waldau S; Lindholm L; Wiechel AH Health Policy; 2010 Aug; 96(3):245-54. PubMed ID: 20227128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Do health-care decision makers find economic evaluations useful? The findings of focus group research in UK health authorities. Hoffmann C; Stoykova BA; Nixon J; Glanville JM; Misso K; Drummond MF Value Health; 2002; 5(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 11918822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Priority setting in hospitals: fairness, inclusiveness, and the problem of institutional power differences. Gibson JL; Martin DK; Singer PA Soc Sci Med; 2005 Dec; 61(11):2355-62. PubMed ID: 15950347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Programme budgeting and marginal analysis: an approach to priority setting in need of refinement. Posnett J; Street A J Health Serv Res Policy; 1996 Jul; 1(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 10180861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Disinvestment for re-allocation: a process to identify priorities in healthcare. Nuti S; Vainieri M; Bonini A Health Policy; 2010 May; 95(2-3):137-43. PubMed ID: 20015568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Communitarian claims and community capabilities: furthering priority setting? Mooney G Soc Sci Med; 2005 Jan; 60(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 15522482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Introducing New Priority Setting and Resource Allocation Processes in a Canadian Healthcare Organization: A Case Study Analysis Informed by Multiple Streams Theory. Smith N; Mitton C; Dowling L; Hiltz MA; Campbell M; Gujar SA Int J Health Policy Manag; 2015 Sep; 5(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 26673646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from Australia. Wiseman V; Mooney G; Berry G; Tang KC Soc Sci Med; 2003 Mar; 56(5):1001-12. PubMed ID: 12593873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The influence of power and actor relations on priority setting and resource allocation practices at the hospital level in Kenya: a case study. Barasa EW; Cleary S; English M; Molyneux S BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Sep; 16(1):536. PubMed ID: 27716185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Stakeholder participation in priority setting - a consideration of the normative status of quantitative and qualitative methods]. Friedrich DR; Stumpf S; Alber K Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(6):412-7. PubMed ID: 22857728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]