These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10622905)

  • 1. Splitting fees or splitting hairs? Fee splitting and health care--the Florida experience.
    Jacobs RO; Goodman E
    Ann Health Law; 1999; 8():239-74. PubMed ID: 10622905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corporate practice, fee splitting and referral fees.
    Hogan CE
    N Y State Dent J; 2008; 74(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 18982962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-referral law's fee caps jolt revenues of Fla. groups.
    de Lafuente D
    Mod Healthc; 1993 Feb; 23(8):33. PubMed ID: 10124230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fear and loathing in Florida--PPMC's, fee-splitting, and anti-kickback implications.
    Gassman AS
    Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Oct; ():3-15. PubMed ID: 10662297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Making sense of referral fee statutes.
    Hall MA
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1988; 13(4):623-33. PubMed ID: 3069899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The organized American medical profession's response to financial conflicts of interest: 1890-1992.
    Rodwin MA
    Milbank Q; 1992; 70(4):703-41. PubMed ID: 1435631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Legal billing for pathology services.
    Glaser DM; Bennett KJ
    Minn Med; 2007 Feb; 90(2):32-5. PubMed ID: 17388258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hospital/physician contracting and the illegality defense.
    Peregrine MW; Waller AA; O'Dwyer JS
    J Health Hosp Law; 1994 May; 27(5):129-40, 160. PubMed ID: 10137987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efforts to address the problem of physician self-referral.
    Iglehart JK
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Dec; 325(25):1820-4. PubMed ID: 1944492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Florida's experiment in health care regulation: the Patient Self-Referral Act of 1992.
    Weinbren DB; Gassman AS
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(4):55-65. PubMed ID: 10122129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Leasing imaging facilities to referring physicians: fee shifting or fee splitting?
    Berlin L; Berlin JW
    Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 15618374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Where business has turned against doctors.
    White O
    Med Econ; 1992 Oct; 69(19):52-4, 58, 64-7. PubMed ID: 10121568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fee splitting in ophthalmology.
    Levin AV; Ganesh A; Al-Busaidi A
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 46(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 21283153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incentive or illegal? Florida PPMs appeal ruling prohibiting fee-splitting.
    Jaklevic MC
    Mod Healthc; 1998 Apr; 28(16):124. PubMed ID: 10179133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physicians and financial conflicts of interest: the next battleground.
    Doherty RB
    Internist; 1988 Oct; 29(9):23-5, 38. PubMed ID: 10290079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fee-splitting.
    Hanlon CR
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1986 Apr; 71(4):1. PubMed ID: 10276057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fee splitting, patient brokering, and other impediments to physician practice management arrangements. In Re: The Petition for Declaratory Statement of Magan L. Bakarania, MD.
    Gassman AS
    Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1998 Feb; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 10178941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phone fees: a justification of physician charges.
    Braithwaite SS; Unferth NO
    J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 8219306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fee splitting in veterinary practice.
    Emswiller BB
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1995 Sep; 207(6):706-9. PubMed ID: 7657565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. U.S. Supreme Court clarifies that owner-employees are protected by ERISA.
    Meadors GM
    J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 15500025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.