314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10622939)
1. Here are key revisions to documentation guidelines.
ED Manag; 1999 Oct; 11(10):114-5. PubMed ID: 10622939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Documentation guidelines: AMA tips hat to final draft.
ED Manag; 1999 Oct; 11(10):115-6. PubMed ID: 10622940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Documentation guidelines for evaluation and management services. American Medical Association, Health Care Financing Administration.
J Ark Med Soc; 1997 Oct; Suppl():1-48. PubMed ID: 9509840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Monitor observation status to make sure new codes are being used.
Hosp Case Manag; 2006 Apr; 14(4):49-51. PubMed ID: 16562573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Variability in code selection using the 1995 and 1998 HCFA documentation guidelines for office services. Health Care Financing Administration.
Zuber TJ; Rhody CE; Muday TA; Jackson EA; Rupke SJ; Francke L; Rathkamp WT
J Fam Pract; 2000 Jul; 49(7):642-5. PubMed ID: 10923576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. E&M: out with the new, in with the old.
Callaway S
Med Econ; 2002 Feb; 79(3):20-3. PubMed ID: 11859784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Coping with the new AMA/HCFA documentation requirements.
Edelberg C
ED Manag; 1997 Dec; 9(12):153-6; suppl 2 p.. PubMed ID: 10175050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation and management guidelines: curse or cure?
Cassidy M
Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1998 Apr; ():24-8. PubMed ID: 10181982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. New guidelines for coding physicians' services--a step backward.
Brett AS
N Engl J Med; 1998 Dec; 339(23):1705-8. PubMed ID: 9834312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Exam documentation just got harder.
Moore KJ; Henry LA
Fam Pract Manag; 1997 Oct; 4(9):75-82, 85. PubMed ID: 10174678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. 1995 CPT documentation guidelines more stringent. Use checklists, templates to prevent oversights.
ED Manag; 1995 Apr; 7(4):41-4, suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10153095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation and management guidelines.
Wetzler HP
N Engl J Med; 1999 Mar; 340(11):890; author reply 890-1. PubMed ID: 10084903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The pitfalls of overcoding evaluation and management services.
Balistreri V
J Med Pract Manage; 2002; 17(5):234-6. PubMed ID: 12024857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. AMA, HCFA release new documentation guidelines for E&M (evaluation and management) services.
Patient Acc; 1997 Oct; 20(10):1. PubMed ID: 10173654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation and management guidelines.
Berenson RA
N Engl J Med; 1999 Mar; 340(11):889; author reply 890-1. PubMed ID: 10084900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Outpatient PPS switch likely to be delayed.
ED Manag; 2000 Jan; 12(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 11067321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Home health medical review: responding to requests for information.
Thietten G
Caring; 1999 Mar; 18(3):24-7. PubMed ID: 10387562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A case-based approach to outpatient evaluation and management service coding.
Staiger TO; Chew LD; Helenius I;
Postgrad Med; 2008 Nov; 120(4):101-6. PubMed ID: 19020372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electronic records: key to HCFA compliance?
McCormack J
Health Data Manag; 1998 Jun; 6(6):40-2, 44. PubMed ID: 10180311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Should you switch to template documentation?
ED Manag; 1999 Aug; 11(8):92-5. PubMed ID: 10539467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
