These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10622940)
1. Documentation guidelines: AMA tips hat to final draft. ED Manag; 1999 Oct; 11(10):115-6. PubMed ID: 10622940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Here are key revisions to documentation guidelines. ED Manag; 1999 Oct; 11(10):114-5. PubMed ID: 10622939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AMA, HCFA release new documentation guidelines for E&M (evaluation and management) services. Patient Acc; 1997 Oct; 20(10):1. PubMed ID: 10173654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Variability in code selection using the 1995 and 1998 HCFA documentation guidelines for office services. Health Care Financing Administration. Zuber TJ; Rhody CE; Muday TA; Jackson EA; Rupke SJ; Francke L; Rathkamp WT J Fam Pract; 2000 Jul; 49(7):642-5. PubMed ID: 10923576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monitor observation status to make sure new codes are being used. Hosp Case Manag; 2006 Apr; 14(4):49-51. PubMed ID: 16562573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Coping with the new AMA/HCFA documentation requirements. Edelberg C ED Manag; 1997 Dec; 9(12):153-6; suppl 2 p.. PubMed ID: 10175050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Should you switch to template documentation? ED Manag; 1999 Aug; 11(8):92-5. PubMed ID: 10539467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Documentation guidelines for evaluation and management services. American Medical Association, Health Care Financing Administration. J Ark Med Soc; 1997 Oct; Suppl():1-48. PubMed ID: 9509840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. HCFA's evaluation and management services: new documentation guidelines for physicians. American Medical Association and Health Care Financing Administration. Forston S Ala Med; 1995 Jan; 64(7):6-13. PubMed ID: 7872164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Between a rock and a hard place with E/M coding: dilemmas of compliance and practice financial viability. Sosa RE; Cascardo D J Med Pract Manage; 2000; 16(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 14608765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Feds take aim at fraud and abuse. Guglielmo WJ Med Econ; 1998 Aug; 75(15):166-8, 171-4, 177-8. PubMed ID: 10182625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Electronic records: key to HCFA compliance? McCormack J Health Data Manag; 1998 Jun; 6(6):40-2, 44. PubMed ID: 10180311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New guidelines for coding physicians' services--a step backward. Brett AS N Engl J Med; 1998 Dec; 339(23):1705-8. PubMed ID: 9834312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation and management guidelines--fatally flawed. Kassirer JP; Angell M N Engl J Med; 1998 Dec; 339(23):1697-8. PubMed ID: 9834308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The pitfalls of overcoding evaluation and management services. Balistreri V J Med Pract Manage; 2002; 17(5):234-6. PubMed ID: 12024857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. HCFA's final rule on APCs is out: ED managers can breathe sighs of relief. ED Manag; 2000 May; 12(5):49-56. PubMed ID: 11067334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]