These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10623062)
1. Hospital asserts antitrust immunity as defense to false statements in Certificate of Need hearings. Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Sep; ():25-7. PubMed ID: 10623062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical and specialty hospitals: a legal primer. Becker S; Harned N Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Jan; ():3-12. PubMed ID: 11842638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ambulatory surgery centers--competition and billing issues lead to legal concerns. Becker S; Werling K Health Care Law Mon; 2003 Feb; ():3-8. PubMed ID: 12666328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Unusual case. Oral hearings set in N.Y. for rare antitrust case. Taylor M Mod Healthc; 2004 Aug; 34(32):18-9. PubMed ID: 15352762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Great flap in Montana. CON lawsuit latest weapon in Great Falls' turf battle. Shinkman R Mod Healthc; 1997 Sep; 27(37):8. PubMed ID: 10173607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Defining the State Action Immunity Doctrine. Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Sep; ():22-5. PubMed ID: 10623061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CON request blocked. Rivals foil Mo. specialty hospital plan. Romano M Mod Healthc; 2007 Apr; 37(14):40. PubMed ID: 17444269 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Keep competing. Fla. settles case involving noncompete CON clauses. Galloro V Mod Healthc; 2003 May; 33(18):6-7. PubMed ID: 12776665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reassessing CON laws. Scrushy verdict raises questions on process' integrity. Zigmond J Mod Healthc; 2006 Jul 3-10; 36(27):12. PubMed ID: 16898543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal ammo. Court decision favoring hospital may boost defense against physician joint ventures. Taylor M Mod Healthc; 2002 Oct; 32(41):17. PubMed ID: 12415992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Running interference. Justice Department looks into S.C.'s CON specifics. Galloro V Mod Healthc; 2006 Sep; 36(35):20. PubMed ID: 16986336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Are state nonprofit hospitals exempt from antitrust laws and RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act). Margolis RE Healthspan; 1991 Apr; 8(4):21-2. PubMed ID: 10183478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. "Opportunity at 'sunset': Missouri relaxes its certificate of need requirements for ambulatory surgery centers". Worsing RA; Patterson LE; Gibbens K Mo Med; 2002 Feb; 99(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 11877860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. New Jersey Appellate Court applies CON regulations retroactively. Liebers E Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1996 Aug; ():9-11. PubMed ID: 10184604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of laser operations; avoiding Certificate of Need requirements. Callahan J Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1996 Jul; ():8-10. PubMed ID: 10161649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Competitors can take advantage of certificate of need proceedings, rules 9th Circuit. Margolis RE Healthspan; 1992 Apr; 9(4):22-3. PubMed ID: 10183661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A tale of two COPAs (Certificate of Public Advantage). Kirchheimer B Mod Healthc; 2000 Jan; 30(5):12-3. PubMed ID: 11009993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Georgia backlash. Decision paves way for surgery-group ASCs. Greene J Mod Healthc; 2007 Dec 24-31; 37(51):32, 34. PubMed ID: 18224747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Georgia CONtroversy. State divided on surgical specialist ASC issue. Robeznieks A Mod Healthc; 2008 Feb; 38(5):18-9. PubMed ID: 18318371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Avoiding antitrust compliance difficulties in mergers and acquisitions. Bryant LE Healthc Financ Manage; 1993 Aug; 47(8):48-50, 52, 54-8. PubMed ID: 10145853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]