These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10623316)

  • 1. Full-field digital mammography. A candid assessment.
    Lewin JM
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Sep; 21(9):40-5. PubMed ID: 10623316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Full-field digital mammography compared with screen-film mammography in the detection of breast cancer: rays of light through DMIST or more fog?
    Tice JA; Feldman MD
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Jan; 107(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 17377840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-aided diagnosis complements full-field digital mammography.
    Nishikawa RM
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Sep; 21(9):47-51, 75. PubMed ID: 10623317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Full-field digital mammography.
    Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ; 2006 Feb; 20(16):1-3. PubMed ID: 16718965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Tomosynthesis combined with mammography detects more breast cancers than mammography alone].
    Scherz N
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2014 Oct; 103(20):1213-4. PubMed ID: 25270753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Clinical evaluation of full-field digital mammography and breast imaging reporting and data system on breast diseases].
    Li JG; Li S; Liu Q; Zhao TT
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 45(7):464-6. PubMed ID: 17686303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Storage, transmission, and retrieval of digital mammography, including recommendations on image compression.
    Avrin D; Morin R; Piraino D; Rowberg A; Detorie N; Zuley M; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):609-14. PubMed ID: 17412135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Computerised assessment of screening mammograms].
    den Heeten GJ; Karssemeijer N
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2011; 155(18):A3035. PubMed ID: 21466728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms.
    van Engeland S; Snoeren PR; Huisman H; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 16524084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
    Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computerized analysis of tissue density effect on missed cancer detection in digital mammography.
    Li L; Wu Z; Salem A; Chen Z; Chen L; George F; Kallergi M; Berman C
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006 Jul; 30(5):291-7. PubMed ID: 16837164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital mammography image quality: image display.
    Siegel E; Krupinski E; Samei E; Flynn M; Andriole K; Erickson B; Thomas J; Badano A; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):615-27. PubMed ID: 17412136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When is breast magnetic resonance imaging recommended for cancer detection?
    Miller JC; Rafferty EA; Specht MC; Thrall JH; Lee SI
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Mar; 5(3):224-6. PubMed ID: 18312973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Artifacts in digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Mammographic screening fulfills the requirements of health control].
    Sandelin K
    Lakartidningen; 1999 Mar; 96(9):983-4. PubMed ID: 10093435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast tomosynthesis.
    Buzek N
    Adv Nurse Pract; 2009 Oct; 17(10):25-6, 28. PubMed ID: 20000159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital mammography in breast cancer screening: a step forward?
    Bluekens AM; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2013 May; 13(5):505-7. PubMed ID: 23617341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wish list for future features of breast MRI computer aided evaluation.
    Kelcz F
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S78-9. PubMed ID: 23083613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.