170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10623318)
1. Process mapping boosts mammography's efficiency and quality.
Whitman GJ; Venable SL; Stelling CB; Kushwaha AC; Harrington A; Lifshitz O
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Sep; 21(9):53-5. PubMed ID: 10623318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality assurance in mammography. Accreditation, legislation, and compliance with quality assurance standards.
Hendrick RE
Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):243-55. PubMed ID: 1732931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Breast cancer screening: a current topic].
Gilles R; Dilhuydy M
J Radiol; 2001 Jun; 82(6 Pt 1):619-20. PubMed ID: 11449163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Quality assurance in organized screening of breast cancer].
De Landtsheer JP; Delaloye JF; Lepori D; De Grandi P; Levi F
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 2003 May; 123(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 15095710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The development and implementation of standards of care in a breast cancer screening program.
Nielsen B; Miaskowski C; McCoy C; Rudisch M
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1991; 18(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 2003118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing mammography's benefits and harms.
Schmidt C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Apr; 106(4):dju103. PubMed ID: 24685934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer: when and how often to get screened. How do you make sense of conflicting mammography guidelines?
Harv Womens Health Watch; 2013 Oct; 21(2):3. PubMed ID: 24432454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality assurance for screening mammography: an international comparison.
Klabunde C; Bouchard F; Taplin S; Scharpantgen A; Ballard-Barbash R;
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2001 Mar; 55(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 11160176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Quality assured images in mammographic screening. Assessment criteria as a basis for national guidelines].
Ståhl M; Edström C
Lakartidningen; 2001 Mar; 98(10):1097-101. PubMed ID: 11301976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditing and benchmarks in screening and diagnostic mammography.
Feig SA
Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):791-800, vi. PubMed ID: 17888769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of mammographic parenchymal patterns in screening for carcinoma of the breast.
Kalisher L; McLelland R
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Jan; 172(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 1985351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [The technique and results of mammography].
Friedrich M
Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):243-59. PubMed ID: 8516435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Balancing mammography's benefits and harms.
Fenton JJ; Elmore JG
BMJ; 2004 Jun; 328(7453):E301-2. PubMed ID: 15191996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Does practice make perfect when interpreting mammography?
Elmore JG; Carney PA
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Mar; 94(5):321-3. PubMed ID: 11880465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How do the latest breast cancer screening recommendations affect you?
Health After 50 Sci Am Consum Health; 2016 Feb; 27(15):4-5. PubMed ID: 27062757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Planning for quality in the NHS breast screening programme.
Gray JA
Qual Health Care; 1992 Jun; 1(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 10136841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality assurance. How to audit your own mammography practice.
Sickles EA
Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):265-75. PubMed ID: 1732933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [National mammography screening--how far are we?].
Vejborg I
Ugeskr Laeger; 2010 Mar; 172(12):947. PubMed ID: 20334781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The role of epidemiological quality parameters in a mammography screening programme].
Becker N
Radiologe; 2006 Nov; 46(11):984-92. PubMed ID: 16177930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Breast cancer screening by mammography: evaluation by Gotzsche and Olsen meta-analysis].
Agence Nationale d'Accrédiation et d'Evaluation en Santé
J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 84(3):336-41. PubMed ID: 12741380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
